MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
13

4

I've read the claim that Fréchet spaces that are not Banach spaces never have a dual that is a Fréchet space, but have not been able to find a proof of this statement. Is it trivial or does someone have a reference?

flag

1 Answer

15

For any locally convex and metrizable space $E$, its strong dual is metrizable if and only if $E$ is normable.

This and related properties of (F)-spaces are discussed in detail in Topological Vector Spaces I by Köthe (see §29.1, pp. 393-394 in the English edition).

link|flag
Thanks, so one has to combine §21.5 (3): "For a Fréchet space, the original topology is equal to the strong topology", with §29.1 (7), which is what you quoted. – Tim van Beek Apr 29 2011 at 7:52
1 
SO what does this mean for the question, for someone who doesn't have instant recall about the lattice of properties of topological vector spaces? – David Roberts Apr 29 2011 at 7:56
1 
@David Roberts: This implies that the claim stated by the OP holds true. The observation is probably due to Grothendieck. – Andrey Rekalo Apr 29 2011 at 8:02
9 
A nice way to think of this is as the observation that a LCTVS cannot be a (non-trivial) projective limit and an inductive limit of countably infinite families of Banach spaces at the same time. Either one family has to be uncountable, or both have to be finite. – Andrew Stacey Apr 29 2011 at 8:45
@Andrew Stacey: That's really nice and intuitively appealing. – Andrey Rekalo Apr 29 2011 at 8:55
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.