2

1

Perhaps this is a naive question (and certainly an idle one):

If $\phi:\mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{R}^3$ is a smooth diffeomorphism with the property that for any compact surface $\Sigma\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ one has

$$Area(\phi(\Sigma))=Area(\Sigma)$$

is $\phi$ necessarily an isometry? Here we are using the euclidean metric.

If the map is distance preserving then it is an isometry by a theorem of Myers and Steenrod (see here for instance). If the map is only volume preserving then it could be affine (or worse) so the result couldn't hold.

I had thought perhaps to approximate geodesics by thin tubes but couldn't see how any such argument wouldn't also hold for volume preserving maps.

flag
4 
This reduces to an infinitesimal problem of characterizing the linear maps $L : \mathbb R^3 \to \mathbb R^3$ which preserve cross product lengths, and it's an undergrad linear algebra-level homework problem to show those are isometries. IMO this is more appropriate for math.stackexchange. – Ryan Budney Apr 27 2011 at 5:03
Your right I was thinking about things the wrong way. I just got hung up on the tubes. – Rbega Apr 27 2011 at 5:06

closed as too localized by Ryan Budney, Andres Caicedo, José Figueroa-O'Farrill, Sergei Ivanov, Simon Thomas Apr 27 2011 at 13:37

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.