# Matrices that are Hadamard products of $X$ and $X^{-T}$

What are the matrices that you can write in the form $X \odot X^{-T}$, for a complex square matrix $X$, where $X^{-T}$ is the inverse of the complex transpose (not conjugate) and $\odot$ is the Hadamard (component-by-component) product?

In the $2\times 2$ case, you get the group of matrices in the form $$\begin{bmatrix}a & b\\\\ b & a \end{bmatrix},$$ with $a+b=1$, which are closed under matrix multiplication and would form a group were it not for the matrix $a=b=\frac12$ which admits no inverse [EDIT: corrected this assertion, thanks to Denis Serre]. In larger dimension, one sees that all the obtained matrices have the vector of all ones as both a right and left eigenvector. Is this the only restriction? Is the resulting set of matrices closed under multiplication? Is this problem known and studied?

Origin: motivated from this MO question.

-
In the $2\times2$ case, there is a restriction on the output: $a+b=0$ (maybe you forgot to divide by the determinant of $X$, which occurs from $X^{-T}$). This makes an affine set that is stable under $\times$, but is not a multiplicative group, because of the matrix with $a=b=\frac12$. –  Denis Serre Apr 26 '11 at 12:42
I think you mean $a+b=1$ --- anyway good point, I omitted it in my computations because it didn't matter for the problem and then forgot about it. –  Federico Poloni Apr 26 '11 at 13:16
yes, $a+b=1$. Sorry for the misprint. –  Denis Serre Apr 26 '11 at 13:44
The question is whether every matrix $A$ such $A\vec e=A^T\vec e=\vec e$ (with $\vec e=(1,\ldots,1)^T$) can be written as $X\odot X^{-T}$. When $A$ has non-negative entries, this is a question about bistochastic matrices. A special case is that of ortho-stochastic matrices, for which such an $X$ exists, a unitary one. But it is known that ortho-stochastic matrices form a small part of bistochastic ones. In addition, we don't want to restrict to non-negative entries. –  Denis Serre Apr 26 '11 at 14:01

In fact I checked chapter 5 and there is quite a detailed discussion of the Hadamard product $X \odot X^{-T}$ --- for instance, they cite the fact the row and column sums are 1. Some of that material was new to me, it does not contain only the "usual" textbook properties of the Hadamard product. –  Federico Poloni Apr 27 '11 at 7:08