Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the universal bundle $G\hookrightarrow EG\rightarrow BG$. Is it possible to get another bundle $EG|_{B}$ by restricting $EG$ over a smooth singular $k$-chain $B \in H_k(BG)$ ($k\leq n$)? I know it's perfectly fine to restrict $EG$ to a submanifold of $BG$, but what about chains?

share|improve this question
    
When you say "a smooth singular chain" where does it live? If you just abstractly think of it then you are asking to build $G$-bundles over $n$-simplices with specified gluing maps. For example if you have two standard simplices which you are gluing along a face then a $G$-bundle over this "chain" is a $G$-bundle over each simplex and a transition data $g:\textrm{face}\to G$ which tells you how to glue the $G$-bundle restricted over one face to the other. –  Somnath Basu Apr 22 '11 at 22:47
    
So, I am looking for a smooth 4-chain in $BG$ which has boundary the image of a 3-manifold $M$ under the classifying map $\gamma:M\rightarrow BG$; that is $\gamma_\ast[M]$. Then I want to restrict $EG$ to this 4-chain, giving a $G$-bundle over $B$ which restricts to a $G$-bundle over $M$ at the boundary. –  Kevin Wray Apr 23 '11 at 2:02
    
You should perhaps rephrase your question accordingly to the more specific thing you explained above. –  Somnath Basu Apr 23 '11 at 2:32
    
Ok, I've rephrased the question. –  Kevin Wray Apr 23 '11 at 3:55
add comment

1 Answer 1

If you have a $G$-bundle over $M$ (without boundary) then this corresponds to the homotopy class of a map $\gamma:M\to BG$. It is known that for $G$ simply connected, any $G$-bundle over $M$ is trivializable. One way to see this is by obstruction theory. The other is to notice that $\pi_i(BG)=\pi_{i-1}(G)$ and for $i=1,2,3$ this is zero. Therefore, one can get a cellular model for $BG$ which has no $3$-cells. Therefore, $\gamma$ is homotopic to a cellular map $\gamma':M\to BG$ which is necessarily constant. Since $\gamma_\ast[M]=0$ in $H_3(BG)$ by Hurewicz and the previous observations, there is a singular $4$-chain $B$ with boundary $\gamma_\ast[M]$. Then using the necessary pullbacks you get what you want.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes, I agree that if $\gamma_\ast[M]=0$ in $H_3(BG)$ then there is some 4-chain $B$ with it as its boundary. However, since $B$ is a 4-chain in $BG$ (which has a bundle over it) does this always mean that I can restrict the bundle over $B$? If so, how does one do this? I mean, don't you need to assume base spaces are manifolds? –  Kevin Wray Apr 23 '11 at 3:22
    
To clarify the above: say I have a bundle $G\hookrightarrow E\rightarrow N$ over some n-manifold $N$. Then can I always restrict the bundle $E$ to a bundle over a k-chain $C$ in $H_k(N)$ (where $k\leq n$), $E|_{C}$ giving another bundle? Or, must I take $C$ to be a submanifold of $N$. Thanks. –  Kevin Wray Apr 23 '11 at 3:26
    
Bundles can be defined with any topological space as base. In the geometric context, you require local triviality, i.e., if $\pi:E\to B$ is a bundle with fibre $F$ then locally $\pi$ should look like the projection map. In the homotopy theoretic context, the homotopy lifting property (also called Serre fibration) defines a fibration $\pi:E\to B$ where a fibre is homotopy equivalent to $F$. –  Somnath Basu Apr 23 '11 at 3:49
    
So, just to be sure, I can always restrict a principal $G$-bundle to some singular smooth chain, and the resulting object will still have the structure of a principal $G$-bundle? Also, would the construction (in the geometric sense) be analogous to the construction when the base is a manifold? Thanks. –  Kevin Wray Apr 23 '11 at 3:55
    
(1) There is a distinction that you have to make : if you take an embedded simplex $\Delta$ in $X$ which is part of a $G$-bundles $G\hookrightarrow E\to X$ then $E$ restricted to $2\Delta$ is just two copies of the $G$-bundles over $\Delta$. (2) In general when you construct a $G$-bundle over $X$, you take an open cover of $X$ and take $U_j\times G$. Then you need to glue $U_i \times G$ to $U_j \times G$ over $(U_i\cap U_j)\times G$. If you were looking for bundles with fibre $G$ then the gluing maps would be given by $g_{ij}:U_i\cap U_j\to \textrm{Aut}(G)$. –  Somnath Basu Apr 23 '11 at 4:05
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.