Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Recall that a spectrum is called connective if it is $(-1)$-connected (that is, its homotopy is concentrated in nonnegative degrees).

However, this left me scratching my head a bit. Why "connective"? Is there some geometric intuition behind it that I'm missing?

share|improve this question
2  
I wasn't aware that the empty spectrum is a spectrum at all. What with the individual components being pointed and all... –  Harry Gindi Apr 18 '11 at 5:54
4  
Maybe just because (-1)-connected is a mouthful? And connected would not be the right term, since that would imply trivial $\pi_0$. Other than that, I don't know. Possibly a better question is: where did the term originate? I have no idea. –  Dan Ramras Apr 18 '11 at 6:02
3  
It is possible, even inevitable at times, to introduce a category of "unbased spectra". This is where the suspension spectra of unbased spaces live. The suspension spectrum of the empty space is the initial object, but I probably wouldn't call it empty. –  Tom Goodwillie Apr 18 '11 at 13:10
7  
It's a pretty trivial thing, but it does come up naturally in some things I think about. There are several equivalent constructions (which one are you thinking of?), and it's interesting to note that they're equivalent. I sometimes think of spectrum vs unbased spectrum (also of category of spectra vs category of unbased spectra) as analogous to vector spaces vs affine spaces. –  Tom Goodwillie Apr 18 '11 at 14:49
4  
My pleasure. I never miss a chance to talk about the empty set. –  Tom Goodwillie Apr 18 '11 at 21:54
show 9 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Maybe just because (-1)-connected is a mouthful? And connected would not be the right term, since that would imply trivial $\pi_0$. Other than that, I don't know.

share|improve this answer
    
For spaces, $k$-connected has come to mean having trivial $\pi_j$ for $j\le k$ (basically -- let's ignore basepoint issues). In hindsight it might have been better to have a term for having trivial $\pi_j$ for $j<k$. Likewise for spectra. Not that "minus one" takes that much longer to say than "zero" ... –  Tom Goodwillie Apr 18 '11 at 21:52
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.