MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I often think about the phase space with quite deep interpretations. For example, contraction of phase space means losing energy. But, some of the energy is easily restored (free energy?) while some other is hard to restore (enthalpy, internal energy). This is like dividing the phase space to flexible and rough?

Are my insights correct or maybe they can be easily extended more?

Are there any books with such interpretation-like approach to phase space and dynamical systems?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off topic by Andrés E. Caicedo, Will Jagy, Steve Huntsman, Igor Rivin, Zev Chonoles Apr 16 '11 at 23:09

Questions on MathOverflow are expected to relate to research level mathematics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

V.I. Arnold - Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics. – J Verma Apr 16 '11 at 21:26
Agree with J. Verma that V.I. Arnold's book is a very good start. Another well-written review (which is considerably shorter) is Saunders Mac Lane's Amer. Math. Monthly article "Hamiltonian mechanics and geometry" (@article{Author = {Mac Lane, Saunders}, Journal = {Amer. Math. Monthly}, Pages = {570--586}, Title = {Hamiltonian mechanics and geometry}, Volume = {77}, Year = {1970}}). It's good to keep in mind too that symplectic structures can arise other than via tautological one-forms on cotangent bundles; for example, the Bloch/Riemann sphere has a natural symplectic structure. – John Sidles Apr 16 '11 at 21:59
up vote 2 down vote accepted

For your kind of reflections I think a useful reference could be the fantastic "The structure of dynamical systems. A symplectic view of physics" of Jean Marie Souriau. In particular take a look at his fourth chapter "Mecanique statistique".

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.