MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the literature there are several different definitions of what is often referred to as Beilinson's height pairing (see for example section 4.3.8 of Gillet and Soulé's paper Arithmetic intersection theory, and this note of Müller-Stach). The height pairing is supposed to generalize the Neron-Tate height pairing. Is there a precise statement in the literature where Beilinson's height pairing for an elliptic curve over $\mathbb{Q}$ is compared to the Neron-Tate pairing?

share|cite|improve this question

Beilinson's original paper on Height pairings does indicate how his height pairing generalises that of Neron-Tate: see page 10 (also, Muller-Stach and Kunneman's works expand on Remark 4.0.8 on page 14). Also, Scholl's paper provides a very nice interpretation (via Ext in mixed motives).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.