MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It is well known that the Mumford-Tate group of a polarizable pure $Q$-Hodge structure is reductive. (this is proved for instance in Deligne et al LNM 900, Voisin's books on Algebraic Geometry,..)

Question: Is there an example of a non-polarizable $Q$-Hodge structure whose Mumford-Tate group is reductive?


share|cite|improve this question

Indeed. Look at Hodge structures as finite dimensional vector spaces $V$ over $\mathbb Q$ together with an action of the Deligne torus $\mathbb S$ on $V \otimes \mathbb C$, i.e. a morphism of algebraic groups $\rho: \mathbb S \to \mathrm{GL}(V \otimes \mathbb C)$. The Mumford--Tate group of $V$ is then just the Zariski closure over $\mathbb Q$ (!) of the imagr of $\rho$.

Now take $V$ of dimension $\geq 4$ and a representation $\rho: \mathbb S \to \mathrm{GL}(V\otimes \mathbb C)$ of pure weight $k$ say, such that the Zariski closure over $\mathbb Q$ of the image of $\rho$ is $\mathrm{GL}(V)$. So the resulting Mumford--Tate group is $\mathrm{GL}(V)$ which is reductive. But the Hodge--structure $V$ is not polarisable, indeed, any polarisation $\psi: V \otimes V \to \mathbb Q(k)$ would confine the Mumford--Tate group to the Goup of symplectic similitudes $\mathrm{GSp}(V,\psi)$ which is strictly smaller than $\mathrm{GL}(V)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Cool! I understand the idea, but could you still add some details on how to arrange for the Zariski closure of the image of $\rho$ to be all of GL(V)? Thanks! – SGP Apr 13 '11 at 23:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.