MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
1

2

Given a finite group and a normal subgroup, does there always exist an irreducible complex representation, whose kernel is this normal subgroup?

Sorry, just it was just mentioned that this is a duplicate. See http://mathoverflow.net/questions/57129/which-finite-groups-have-faithful-complex-irreducible-representations.

flag
3 
I think the answer is clearly no. Irreducible complex representations of abelian groups are 1-dimensional, while every subgroup is normal. So no proper normal subgroup can be the kernel of an irreducible representation. – David Hill Apr 12 2011 at 13:46
2 
Well, for finite abelian groups the kernels of irreducible complex representations would be the subgroups such that the quotient is cyclic. – Charles Matthews Apr 12 2011 at 13:53

3 Answers

4

take the canonical quotient $q:G\rightarrow G/H$ and $\lambda :G/H\rightarrow U(n)$ to be the left-regular representation of $G/H$, where $n=|G/H|$, then the composition is the map that you are looking for, unless I am missing something...

Edit: if you consider irreducible representations, then the answer is no for the group $\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2\oplus\mathbb{Z}_2$.

link|flag
Sorry forgot the adjective "irreducible" before. – Marc Palm Apr 12 2011 at 13:28
for the irreducible case, the answer is no, see above – Kate Juschenko Apr 12 2011 at 13:36
1 
the sum of $3$ terms of $\mathbb{Z}_2$ is just for having proper normal subgroup. But if you don't want to assume this, the answer of BS is completely describes the situation. – Kate Juschenko Apr 12 2011 at 13:52
4

In the new formulation (irreducible rep), the question is wether any finite group has a faithful irreducible complex representation. This is false for noncyclic abelian groups. A more complete answer is here

link|flag
1

Yes, consider the quotient by this normal subgroup, embeds it into symmetric group of $n$ letters with $n$ large enough, identify symmetric group with a subgroup of $GL(n)$, you get the representation.

link|flag
Good answer, forgot the adjective "irreducible". Is it still true? – Marc Palm Apr 12 2011 at 13:27

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.