Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As usual $\sigma_k(n)$ denotes the sum of the $k$-th powers of the positive divisors of an integer $n.$ Note that $k$ is also an integer so that it may be negative.

There are no odd perfect numbers known but there are many numbers $N$ such that $$ \sigma(N) \equiv 2 \pmod{4} $$ i.e.; many numbers of the form:

$$ N = p^{4k+1}m^2 $$ with $\gcd(p,m)=1$ and $p$ a prime number with $p \equiv 1 \pmod{4}.$

Since $$ 2\sqrt{2} $$ equals the minimum of the $2z+1/z$ when $0 < z \leq 1,$ attained for $$ z=z_0 = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}, $$

by putting

$$ z =\frac{p^{4k+1}}{\sigma(p^{4k+1})} $$

It may have some interest the

Question: For which numbers $k$ and prime numbers $p \equiv 1 \pmod{4}$ the $z$ above is close to $z_0$, say appears as a convergent in the continued fraction of $z_0.$

question inspired by some MO posts of Arnie Dris:

a) In his notation I am asking here when the sum below is minimal

$$ I(p^{4k+1}) + I(m^2) = \sigma_{-1} (p^{4k+1}) + \sigma_{-1}(m^2) $$

b) Arnie wanted $2N=\sigma(N)$ so that in his case

$$ I(p^{4k+1}) = 1/z $$

and

$$ I(m^2)= 2z $$

so that

$$ I(p^{4k+1})+I(m^2)=2z+1/z $$

share|improve this question
    
I'm confused. First, $\sigma_k()$ is defined but never used. Second, where $2z + 1/z$ comes from? –  Max Alekseyev Apr 9 '11 at 6:31
    
Notation $\sigma_k$ is used in line 4, with $k=1$, in line $13$ with $k=1,$ and twice in line $-1$ with $k=-1.$ Arnie wanted $2N=\sigma(N)$ so that in his case $$ I(p^{4k+1}) = 1/z $$ and $$ I(m^2)= 2z $$ so that $$ I(p^{4k+1})+I(m^2)=2z+1/z $$ –  Luis H Gallardo Apr 9 '11 at 21:46
    
For clarity comment above is incorporated to question. –  Luis H Gallardo Apr 10 '11 at 0:45
    
@Luis, +1 for looking at the problem in a different way! :) I have recently been able to come up with some (further) results on Sorli's conjecture. You might want to check out this Scribd hyperlink for now: scribd.com/doc/52851078/…. I will try to come up with something more readable within the next two weeks. –  Jose Arnaldo Dris Apr 13 '11 at 3:16
    
@Luis, I just happened to look at this one again today, and I think you should have $I(p^{4k+1}) = 2z$ and $I(m^2) = 1/z$ owing to parity constraints. –  Jose Arnaldo Dris Jan 28 '12 at 12:34
show 1 more comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Note that $$z = \frac{p^{4k+1}}{\sigma(p^{4k+1})} = \frac{1-p^{-1}}{1-p^{-(4k+2)}} > 1-p^{-1}.$$ Clearly, for a fixed p, the larger is $k$ the closer is $z$ to this lower bound.

Since the lower bound is greater than $z_0$ (for any prime $p\geq 5$) and grows with $p$, it is beneficial to take $p$ as small as possible. The smallest such prime $p\equiv 1\pmod{4}$ is $p=5$.

Therefore, for any prime $p\equiv 1\pmod{4}$ and $k\geq 0$, we have $$z - z_0 = \frac{p^{4k+1}}{\sigma(p^{4k+1})} - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} > \frac{4}{5} - \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} > 0.09$$ where $$\frac{4}{5} = \lim_{k\to\infty} \frac{5^{4k+1}}{\sigma(5^{4k+1})}.$$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.