Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question is related to this one. The setup is as follows:

In $V$, $\kappa$ is supercompact and $\mathbb{P} = \mathrm{Coll}(\kappa, \aleph_2)$ is the Levy collapse. $G$ is $(V,P)$-generic, and in $V[G]$, $C \subset P_{\kappa}(\lambda)$ is club. Let $j : V \to M$ be an embedding witnessing $\lambda$-supercompactness of $\kappa$. Lift this embedding to $j^{\ast} : V[G] \to M[G \times H]$ where we may assume $H$ is generic over $V[G]$ for the poset $\mathrm{Coll}^{V[G]}(j(\kappa), \aleph_2)$ (note $\aleph_2 ^{V[G]} = \kappa$). Now in $V[G \times H]$ we define $U \subset P_{\kappa}^{V[G]}(\lambda)$ by:

$x \in U$ iff $j[\lambda] \in j^{\ast}(x)$.

This $U$ belongs to $V[G \times H]$, but $V[G]$ "would" think its a normal measure on $P_{\kappa}^{V[G]}(\lambda)$, i.e. it's $\kappa$-complete if we restrict to $<\kappa$-sequences in $V[G]$ and it's normal if we restrict to regressive functions $f : P_{\kappa}^{V[G]}(\lambda) \to \lambda$ where $f \in V[G]$. My question:

Does $U$ also extend the club filter, if we restrict to clubs in $V[G]$?

share|cite|improve this question
By $\text{Coll}(\kappa, \aleph_2)$, you don't mean the set of partial functions from $\aleph_2$ into $\kappa$ having size at most $\aleph_1$, do you? In this case, $U$ will not contain any subsets of $(P_{\omega_2}(\lambda))^{V[G]}$ because $j''\lambda$ will be too big. Since I would refer to that poset as $\text{Coll}(\aleph_2, \kappa)$, I'm thinking maybe you mean an Easton product $\prod_{\alpha < \kappa} \text{Coll}(\aleph_1, \alpha)$. Is this interpretation correct? –  Jason Apr 29 '11 at 7:01
@Jason, I meant the Levy collapse, where each condition is a set of functions of the form $p = \{ f_{\alpha} : \alpha \in S_p\}$ where $S_p$ is a countable subset of $\kappa$ and each $f_{\alpha}$ is a countable partial function from $\omega_1$ to $\alpha$. –  Amit Kumar Gupta Apr 29 '11 at 15:28
@Amit: OK, so it's what I've seen as $\text{Coll}(\aleph_1, {<}\kappa)$. Thanks. –  Jason Apr 30 '11 at 3:11

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

With the help of Jason's answer to the question I linked to, I think I might be able to solve this one. The key is to show that $P_{\kappa}^{V[G]}(\lambda) \in M[G\times H]$. Let's simply denote this set by $X$. An element $x$ of $X$ can be regarded as a function $x : \omega_1 \to \lambda$, which will be a subset of $\omega_1 \times \lambda$. A nice name for such a subset is a map, in $V$, from $\omega_1 \times \lambda$ to the collection of antichains in $\mathbb{P}$. Since $\mathbb{P}$ has the $\kappa$-chain condition and $\mathbb{P} \in M$, $M$ correctly knows the set of antichains of $\mathbb{P}$. Since $M^{\lambda} \subset M$, $M$ correctly knows the set of nice $(V,\mathbb{P})$-names for subsets of $\omega_1 \times \lambda$, let's call this set $Y$.

Now $\mathbb{P}$ names are $j(\mathbb{P})$ names (since $\mathbb{P} \subset j(\mathbb{P})$), so we get that

$X = \{ \dot{x}^{G\times H}\ |\ \dot{x}^{G\times H} : \omega_1 \to \lambda, \dot{x} \in Y \} $

This is since $\dot{x}^{G \times H} = \dot{x}^G$ for nice $(V,\mathbb{P})$-names. So $X \in M[G \times H]$ as desired.

Recall, we want to show that $U$ extends the club filter, so take $C \in V[G]$ club in $X$. Following the hint in the previous question, we want to show that

  • $D = \{j^{\ast}(x)\ |\ x \in C\}$ belongs to $M[G \times H]$
  • $D$ has size less than $j(\kappa)$ in $M[G \times H]$, and
  • $\bigcup D = j''\lambda$.

Then, since $D$ is a directed subset of $j^{\ast}(C)$, elementarity will give us that $j''\lambda \in j^{\ast}(C)$, as desired.

Since $M^{\lambda} \subset M$, we know that $g := j\upharpoonright \lambda \in M$. So for $x \in X$ (and in particular for $x \in C$), $j^{\ast}(x) = j''x = g''x$. Using this it's not hard to see that $\bigcup D = j''\lambda$. It also implies that

$j^{\ast}$ $''X$ $= \{j^{\ast}(x)\ |\ x \in X\}$ $= \{j''x\ |\ x \in X\} = \{g''x\ |\ x \in X\}$

belongs to $M$. Now if $h : X \to C$ is a surjection in $V[G]$, then $j^{\ast}(h)\upharpoonright j^{\ast}$ $''X$ is belongs to $M[G\times H]$ and its range is $D$, so $D \in M[G\times H]$.

It remains to show $M[G\times H] \vDash |D| < j(\kappa)$. Since $j(\kappa)$ is inaccessible in $M$, there's some bijection $i: \alpha \to Y$ in $M$ for some $\alpha < j(\kappa)$. This gives a surjection $k : \alpha \to X$ in $M[G\times H]$. We can obtain a bijection $l : X \to j^{\ast}$ $''X$ via $l(x) = g''x$. And $j^{\ast}(h)\upharpoonright j^{\ast}$ $''X$ is a surjection onto $D$. So:

$M[G\times H] \vDash |D| \leq |j^{\ast}$ $''X| = |X| \leq \alpha < j(\kappa)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.