Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given a matrix $A\in GL_n(\mathbb{Q})$. Can it be expressed as a product of two matrices $B,C$ with $B\in GL_n(\mathbb{Z}[1/p])$ and $C\in GL_{n}(\mathbb{Z}_{(p)})$, where $ \mathbb{Z_p}$ denotes the localization of $\mathbb{Z}$ at $(p)$ ?

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Yes, there exists such a decomposition. Multiplying $A$ by a suitable integer, we may assume that $A \in M_n(\mathbf{Z})$ and $\det(A) \neq 0$. By the theory of elementary divisors, we have $A=\gamma_1 D \gamma_2$ with $\gamma_1,\gamma_2 \in SL_n(\mathbf{Z})$ and $D$ is a diagonal matrix with nonzero integral entries. Now the result is true for $D$, and letting $D=M_1 M_2$ with $M_1 \in GL_n(\mathbf{Z}[1/p])$ and $M_2 \in GL_n(\mathbf{Z}_{(p)})$, we see that $B=\gamma_1 M_1$ and $C=M_2 \gamma_2$ work.

share|cite|improve this answer
NOw I am wondering what happens in the more general version where we want to decompose a matrix in $GL_n(R\otimes S)$ in two matrices over $R$ and $S$ like above? I guess in general this is not possible, right? –  HenrikRüping Apr 5 '11 at 8:55
It is really impossible, as the matrix $(1,xy;0,1)$ over $\mathbb{Z}[X,Y]\cong \mathbb{Z}[X]\otimes \mathbb{Z}[Y]$ shows. –  HenrikRüping Apr 5 '11 at 11:15
@Henrik: indeed, the above proof uses crucially the fact that $\mathbf{Z}$ is principal. I don't know if it still works when the base ring is not principal. –  François Brunault Apr 5 '11 at 11:33
Indeed the upper matrix is not even contained in the subgroup spanned by $GL_2(\mathbb{K}[X])$ and $GL_2(\mathbb{K}[Y])$. –  HenrikRüping Apr 6 '11 at 10:23

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.