MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Geometric class field theory (curves over a finite field) has been generalized to higher dimensional varieties over a finite field (and other arithmetical fields). Some of the key names here are Lang, Serre, Bloch, Kato-Saito...

Question: Does there exist a precise formulation of Langlands's conjectures which constitutes a non-abelian generalization of these results?

Probably relevant: Kazhdan's talk here at the Panel on Open Questions held at Gross's 60th Birthday Conference.

share|cite|improve this question
As far as I know, there is no formulation of geometric Langlands for higher dimensional varieties. However, there is a lot of interesting things in this direction discussed here: – Vinoth Apr 3 '11 at 0:25
Thanks for the link to the other MO question. Ben-Zvi's answer seems to suggest that generalizations of the geometric version seem to be limited by physics (I may be misreading his answer -- I apologize). I am wondering about a generalization of the old-fashioned classical (arithmetical) Langlands's conjectures. – SGP Apr 3 '11 at 1:31

From what I remember, Kapranov's paper "Analogies between the Langlands correspondence and topological quantum field theory" has some speculations about this. A wise old friend once called it the most speculative paper he'd ever seen in print.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! very interesting paper..but sadly it does not contain a precise formulation of the conjectural generalization. – SGP Apr 3 '11 at 1:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.