MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
2

3

The answer to the original question is no, see JSE!

Are the $\Gamma(N)$ the only normal congruence subgroups of $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$ with no finite subgroups (elliptic elements)? What about the normal subgroups of $\Gamma(4)$, which does not contain torsion elements. Here, $\gamma \in \Gamma(N)$, if $\gamma \cong 1 \mod N$.

I state the question in the local picture for general G: Let $o$ be a local ring and $G \subset GL(n)$ a group. Then it makes sense to speak about $G( p^r)$, which consists of matrices which are congruent to $1$ modulo $p^r$, where $p$ is the maximal ideal in $o$. From $o \rightarrow o/\p^r$, we get an exact sequence $$ G(p^r) \rightarrow G(o) \rightarrow G( o / p^r).$$ Is it surjective? I guess the $G(p^r)$ form a basis of neighborhoods for $1$ and are normal open compact subgroups. Under which conditions are these all normal subgroups in $G(o)$ with no finite subgroups?

flag
1 
You need your local ring to be compact in the $p$-adic topology to say that the congruence subgroups are compact. This is not true for local rings in general, but it is true for complete dvrs. – S. Carnahan Apr 1 2011 at 5:27

1 Answer

10

Almost but not quite. A congruence subgroup has to contain some Gamma(N). So if it is normal its image in SL_2(Z) / Gamma(N) is a normal subgroup of SL_2(Z/NZ). That group is almost simple but not quite. A proper normal subgroup need not be trivial; it could be +-1 for instance. Or if N is very small you have a few more choices; for instance, the commutator subgroup of SL_2(Z) is a finite-index congruence subgroup of (if I recall correctly) index 12, containing Gamma(6).

link|flag
Sorry, I meant of course $PSL$ instead of $SL$. What for subgroup of $\Gamma(4)$ instead of $\Gamma(1)$? Do the elipptic elements/finite subgroups give the trouble? – Marc Palm Mar 31 2011 at 15:47
Please forgive me that I changed the questions accordingly.... – Marc Palm Mar 31 2011 at 16:08
1 
Gamma(4) will have new normal subgroups; Gamma(4)/Gamma(8) is (Z/2Z)^3 so you have a whole bunch of normal subgroups in between those two. – JSE Mar 31 2011 at 17:07

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.