2
$\begingroup$

Sorry, I misuse the concept of quasi-isometry, I mean almost isometry(also called a Hausdorff approximation).

As we known, isometric Riemann manifolds have the same spectrum of Laplace-Beltrami. And it defined a class of isospectral manifolds which is a highly identical signature of manifold. However, in application, almost-isometry is more useful. Does anyone provide me an overview or reference of the relationship between spectrum and almost-isometry?

Almost isometry say for two metric space(Riemann manifold). there exist $\varepsilon$ and $f: X\rightarrow Y$ s.t.

  1. $|d(x,y)-d(f(x),f(y))|<\varepsilon$ for $x,y\in X$
  2. for any point $y\in Y$, there exists an $x\in X$ s.t. $d(f(x),y)<\varepsilon$

the question is: Given two riemann manifold, how to check almost isometry and estimate inf $ \{\varepsilon\}$ from spectrum data.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think you're asking the right question: the theory of isospectral manifolds generally focuses on closed manifolds, but any two compact metric spaces are automatically quasi-isometric. Quasi-isometries don't care at all about local structure - they are best adapted to large scale problems involving non-smooth spaces. So it's hard to imagine what the sort of connection that you're asking about would look like. $\endgroup$ Mar 29, 2011 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I failed to express my idea. My focus is about local structure, I misuse the concept of quasi-isometry. However I did not found a way to describe which two manifold are "almost" isometric. For example, the bounding surfaces of a non-rigid object may be "near" isometric of different poses. Their spectrum data seems be continuously change with respect to pose change. The deformation of a metric space will have corresponding change of their spectrum data. For two metric, considering their map $f$. inf{e: |d(x,y)-d(f(x),f(y)|< e} estimate compute min w.r.t $f$ $\endgroup$
    – bobye
    Mar 29, 2011 at 11:42

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

The above comments are still mostly valid with $\epsilon$-isometries:

if $(M,g)$ and $(N,g)$ are Riemannian manifolds with diameters less than $D$, then

$f:M\to N$, $x\mapsto n_0$ for some $n_0\in N$ has

$$ |d_N(f(x),f(x')) - d_M(x,x')| = d_M(x,x') \leq D $$

and for all $y \in N$, because $$ d_N(y,n_0) \leq D $$

this $f$ is a $D$-isometry. So, just having a $\epsilon$-isometry for some large $\epsilon$ should not be seen as an unlikely occurrence (however, the (even weaker) notion of quasi-isometry that you used before is an interesting idea, but some sort noncompactness plays a big role in things, as should be obvious from all of these answers.


On the other hand, $\epsilon$-isometries and the spectrum are certainly related in some ways, particularly with lower Ricci bounds:

For example in the paper by Cheeger and Colding, "On the structure of spaces with Ricci curvature bounded below. III." (J. Differential Geom., 54(1):37–74, 2000.) they prove that for manifolds with appropriate Ricci lower bounds, under Gromov-Hausdorff convergence the spectrum and eigenfunctions converge in some sense.

For example, their Theorem 7.11 says:

For $M_1^n$, $M_2^n$, Riemannian manifolds satisfying $$ Ric \geq -(n-1) $$ and $$ diam(N_1^n) \leq d < \infty $$ Then for all $N < \infty$ and $\epsilon > 0$ there is a $\delta(n,d,\epsilon,N) > 0$ such that if $$ d_{GH}(M_1^n,M_2^n) < \delta $$ then for $j\leq N$, we have that $|\lambda_{j,1} - \lambda_{j,2}| <\epsilon$, where $\lambda_{i,k}$ is the $i$-th eigenvalue on the $M_k$.

You can get more information about this here, which also links to some interesting looking work by Lott about how the same question with the laplacian on $p$-forms.


Just to clarify how $d_{GH}$ is related to $\epsilon$-isometries, in case it is unclear. It is a theorem that the Gromov-Hausdorff distance is $<\epsilon$ if there exists an $\epsilon/2$-isometry and vice versa. A good place to read about this is here


Thus, this should give you some sort of condition on how close two compact manifolds can be in the Gromov-Hausdorff topology, if you know their spectrum. Rescale them so that $Ric \geq -(n-1)$, and then applying Theorem 7.11 you can get a lower bound on $\epsilon$. I'm not sure how explicit the $\delta$ is in their proof, however, if this is important to you.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

The sphere, the torus and the compact surfaces of genus $g>1$ have very different Laplace-Beltrami operators. However, since all of them are compact are quasi-isometric to a point. As Paul mentioned, the local properties of the manifold are irrelevant to the quasi-isometries. Quasi-isometries only capture the large scale phenomenon of the manifold.

On the other hand, if I recall correctly if your manifold has the linear isoperimetric property (which is captured in the spectrum of the Laplacian) so does a quasi-isometric manifold.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly, I did not express my question properly. Please re-consider my problem. Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – bobye
    Mar 29, 2011 at 11:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.