Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(M^{2n},\omega)$ be a symplectic manifold with an integral symplectic form $\omega$. Due to the work of M.Gromov and D.Tischler (M.Gromov "A topological technique for the construction of solutions of differential equations and inequalities", D.Tischler "Closed 2-forms and an embedding theorem for symplectic manifolds"), there exists a symplectic embedding $$ (M,\omega) \rightarrow (\mathbb{C}P^{2n+1},\omega_{FS}),$$ where $\omega_{FS}$ denote by the Fubini-Study form on the projective space. For example, Kodaira-Thurston manifold is a symplectic submanifold of $\mathbb{C}P^5$.

My questions are as follows :

  1. Is there an example of non-Kaehler symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ which can be embedded into $\mathbb{C}P^n$ for some $n \leq 4$? (There is no restriction of the dimension of $M$.)

  2. Is there an example of non-Kaehler symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ of dimension $2n$ which can be embedded into $\mathbb{C}P^{n+1}$? (I mean, $M$ is a submanifold of codimension 2)

I really appriciate for your any comments.

share|improve this question
2  
If you are happy with just an opinion, it looks to me that both question might be open. I would think, that the answer to 1 should be positive, i.e., there should be a conter-example, a 4-dimensional symplectic non-Kahler submanifold in $\mathbb CP^4$. The only positive statement for questions of this type that I know, is that it is expected that a symplectic surface in $CP^2$ is symplecticly isotopic to an aglebraic curve. –  Dmitri Mar 27 '11 at 21:12
add comment

1 Answer 1

You can embed T^2 into CP^2, and I think by a suitable fibering construction, you should be able to embed the Kodaira-Thurston symplectic non-Kaehler manifold symplectically into a CP^2-bundle over CP^2. I think the bundle can be made trivial, yielding CP^2 \times CP^2 (have not checked the details). Obviously, it's hard to say what the cohomology class of the resulting symplectic form would be.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.