Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I apologize in advance for what is probably a very naive question: I'd like to understand the Fourier coefficients of newforms, and so I was wondering what exactly was known about them (I do know that the situation isn't as straightforward as for Eisenstein series). I have looked at the algorithms in Modular Forms a Computational Approach, but I was hoping for more explicit expressions.

In particular, when I run the command Newforms(CuspForms(N,k)) for lowish weight and level in Magma, the q-expansions that are outputted usually look "nice" (for example one q-expansion will differ from another by a quadratic character). I was interested in more information on this, as well as any explanation for why Magma outputs the expansions in the form that they do. Thanks!

share|improve this question
    
When you say differ by a quadratic character, how do you mean? When I think of twisting a newform (say of level N and weight 2) by a quadratic character (of conductor D with D squarefree and coprime to N) the resulting newform should no longer be of level N, but rather N(D^2). –  stankewicz Mar 22 '11 at 16:05
    
I mean, for example (and I could be totally misunderstanding any number of things including what is output), if I type: Newforms(CuspForms(25,4)); [* [* q + q^2 + 7*q^3 - 7*q^4 + 7*q^6 + 6*q^7 - 15*q^8 + 22*q^9 - 43*q^11 + O(q^12) ], [ q - q^2 - 7*q^3 - 7*q^4 + 7*q^6 - 6*q^7 + 15*q^8 + 22*q^9 - 43*q^11 + O(q^12) ], [ q + 4*q^2 - 2*q^3 + 8*q^4 - 8*q^6 - 6*q^7 - 23*q^9 + 32*q^11 + O(q^12) *] *] Now let $f_1=\sum a(n)q^n$ be the first series, and $f_2=\sum b(n)q^n$ the second. Then, looking at their q-expansion, it seems that $$a(p)=\phi(p)b(p)$$ where $\phi$ is quadratic mod 5. –  Jill Mar 22 '11 at 17:08
    
Jill, this has to do with the fact that $25=5^2$; a twist of a level $d^2$ form by a quadratic character of conductor $d$ will also have level $d^2$. However, for e.g. squarefree levels this kind of thing will never happen. –  David Hansen Mar 22 '11 at 18:21
    
Excuse me, should've written "...will SOMETIMES also have level $d^2$." –  David Hansen Mar 22 '11 at 18:22
    
As for your Magma output question, it appears (from your singular example) that it returns a normalized Fourier expansion (first coefficient is 1), which is typically what one does. –  Kimball Mar 23 '11 at 14:32
show 3 more comments

2 Answers

I'm not quite sure what kind of information you're expecting, but there is a basis of the space of newforms which consists of eigenfunctions of the Hecke operators, which means there is an Euler product expression ; this is Atkin-Lehner theory.

One could also mention growth conditions...

Serre's "Cours d'arithmétique" is a nice reference, and there are english translations.

EDIT. Yes, in the reference I gave, Serre limits himself to level one -- but he does cover Hecke operators and their eigenfunctions and discuss coefficients growth and Euler product, so the basics are nicely laid out.

Other references : Miyake's "Modular forms", Hida's "Elementary theory of $L$-functions and Eisenstein series", Bump's "Automorphic forms and representations"... and of course, there's Shimura's "Introduction to the arithmetic theory of automorphic functions"!

EDIT2. Manin&Panchishkin's "Introduction to modern number theory" has a nice exposition of the Atkin-Lehner theory too. I can't help but notice that I'm still not quite sure what type of information was expected... and mostly keep on piling on references...

share|improve this answer
    
Well, there's at least 1 English translation. –  Kimball Mar 23 '11 at 14:30
    
Doesn't Serre only address forms of level 1 in that book? I think that will preclude a nuanced discussion of newforms. –  Ramsey Mar 23 '11 at 15:15
1  
In my opinion, Iwaniec's "Topics in classical automorphic forms" book is infinitely more readable than any of the ones you've listed (Serre excluded, of course). –  David Hansen Mar 24 '11 at 13:53
    
That is the reason why I mentioned Serre first ;-) –  Julien Puydt Mar 24 '11 at 14:18
add comment

You should have a look at Ken Ono's nice book: The Web of Modularity: Arithmetic of the Coefficients of Modular Forms and q-series. Theorem 2.27 in this book is a theorem of Atkin and Lehner that "captures the essential properties of a newform" in the integer weight case. Read section 3.4 for Kohnen's theory for the half-integer weight case.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.