Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given a coherent and torsion free sheaf $F$ on a smooth projective scheme $S$.

Then we have a bijection between $Ext^1_S(F,F)$ and deformations of $F$ over $k[\epsilon]$, $\epsilon^2=0$.

Assume all obstructions classes belonging to $F$ vanish, e.g. $Ext^2(F,F)=0$ and we have a nontrivial element $x \in Ext^1(F,F)$, i.e. a deformation $G$ of $F$ over $k[\epsilon]$.

Can we extend this deformation to a curve? More precisely:

Can we find a deformation $\mathcal{F}$ of $F$ over a smooth connected curve $C$, such that $\mathcal{F}$ gives back $G$ under the pullback induced by $Spec(k[\epsilon])\rightarrow C$?

If yes, is this merely an existence result or can we construct the sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ and the curve $C$?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Let us assume that we are working over $\mathbb{C}$.

If $F$ is a stable sheaf then the answer to your first question is yes.

In fact, in this case there exists a quasi-projective moduli space $M$ and, since $Ext^2(F, F)=0$, at the point $[F]$ this moduli space is smooth, of dimension $Ext^1(F, F)$. Moreover, the tangent space $T_{[F]}M$ is canonically identified with $Ext^1(F, F)$.

By the (uni)versal property of the moduli space, the first-order deformation corresponding to $x \in Ext^1(F, F)$ is obtained by pull-back of the universal family $\mathcal{V} \to M$ under a uniquely determined morphism $v \colon \textrm{Spec}(k[\varepsilon]) \to M$, such that $v(\textrm{closed point})=[F]$.

Since $M$ is smooth at $[F]$, we can choose a smooth curve $C$ with a marked point $p$ and an embedding $\iota \colon C \to M$ such that

  1. $\iota(p)=[F]$;

  2. the tangent vector of $\iota(C)$ at the point $[F]$ equals $x$.

Therefore pulling back the universal family $\mathcal{V} \to M$ via $\iota \colon C \to M$ we obtain a deformation $\mathcal{F}$ of $F$ over the curve $C$ with the desired properties.

Of course this is only an existence result, and I think there are no constructive methods available in general.

share|improve this answer
Okay, that looks good. Two questions: i thought a universal family only exists if $M$ is a fine moduli space? Or can we do this locally where such a family exists? What about connectedness of $C$? Can we always choose $C$ in such a way that we stay in one connected component of $M$? –  TonyS Mar 14 '11 at 19:43
(1) I assume that $[F]$ lies in the open set of the moduli space where the universal family exists. (2) You can assume that $C$ is a smooth and connected quasi-projective curve, in particular you can assume that it lies in one connected component of $M$. In fact, since $M$ is quasi-projective, you can obtain $M$ as a (general) complete intersection of hyperplane sections through $[F]$. –  Francesco Polizzi Mar 15 '11 at 9:01
Thanks for your help. –  TonyS Mar 15 '11 at 11:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.