MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given a Shimura variety $S$, is it possible to imbed $S$ as a special Subvariety of the Siegel modular variety $A_{g,N}$, for some $g$ and level $N$? I expect that the answer is yes, essentially since every semisimple group over $\mathbb{Q}$ should imbed into $GL_n$ via its adjoint representation, and $GL_n$ imbeds into $SP_{2n}$. However, I'm a bit worried about the business regarding weights.

Thank you, Jacob

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The answer is no, in general. The problem is to find an embedding so that the minuscule character corresponding to the Shimura datum for $S$ induces the minuscule character of $GSp_{2n}$ corresponding to a decomposition into Lagrangians.

In the affirmative direction, for most classical, simply connected groups (and only for classical groups, i.e. of types $A$,$B$,$C$ and $D$), the answer is yes; some subtleties crop up for $Spin^*(2n)$ (this is the so called $D^{\mathbb{H}}$ case), for which only the quotient by an order 2 central sub-group admits a symplectic embedding (of Shimura data).

This is all beautifully laid out in Deligne's article 'Varietes de Shimura...' here, following Satake here. See also Proposition 1.21 in Milne's article here

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! Just so I understand, for the classical groups, the answer is yes independantly of the $\mathbb{Q}$-structure? So for instance, for any Shimura variety arising as a quotient of the Siegel upper half plane? – jacob Mar 8 '11 at 22:41
Yes, the question doesn't depend on the $\mathbb{Q}$-structure; see 2.3.10 in Deligne's article. You have to be careful to distinguish between a Shimura variety and its (geometrically) connected components. In general, only the latter can be quotients of the upper half plane. – Keerthi Madapusi Pera Mar 9 '11 at 5:28
It is not quite correct that the answer does not depend on the $\mathbb{Q}$-structure. For example, let $G$ be a $\mathbb{Q}$-group such that the decomposition of $G_{\mathbb{R}}$ into a product of simple $\mathbb{R}$-groups contains both $\mathrm{SO}(8,2)$ and $\mathrm{SO}^*(10)$ (and only these $\mathbb{R}$-groups). If $G$ is a product of $\mathbb{Q}$-abolutely-simple groups, then a Shimura datum $(G,X)$ admits a symplectic embedding. However, if $G$ is $\mathbb{Q}$-simple, then $(G,X)$ has no symplectic embeddings. – Mikhail Borovoi Mar 9 '11 at 11:37
Ah, yes, they must be of pure $D$-type. Thank you for the correction. – Keerthi Madapusi Pera Mar 9 '11 at 15:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.