1

2

Let $F$ be an arbitrary field of characteristic $0$, $K$ its algebraic closure. Define $M=\{ (x,y)\in M_n(F)×M_n(F) \mid [x,y]=0\}$ and let $N$ be the Zariski closure of $M$ in $K^{2n^2}$.

How can one show that $N$ contains the set $\{(axa^{-1},aya^{-1}) \mid (x,y)\in N, a\in \mathrm{GL}(n,K)\}$?

Thank you.

flag
2 
It seems to me that $M$ itself is Zariski closed. – Johannes Ebert Mar 7 2011 at 19:46
1 
From the way this problem is phrased, it seems to be designed to test understanding of basic algebraic geometry. In the absence of other information, I think it very likely that it is coursework. Voting to close. – Victor Protsak Mar 7 2011 at 20:01
1 
@Victor: Sorry, I was reading this in an article where it was left as "easy to check". – spelas Mar 7 2011 at 20:18
1 
My comment was wrong. If $F \neq K$, then $M$ is not Zariski closed. – Johannes Ebert Mar 7 2011 at 20:33

1 Answer

4

Note that $M$ is invariant under the $GL_n(F)$-action given by $a \cdot (x,y):=(axa^{-1},aya^{-1})$. It follows that its closure $N$ is also invariant under $GL_n(F)$. Since $F$ is infinite and $GL_n$ is reductive, the rational points $GL_n(F)$ are Zariski-dense in $GL_n(K)$ by Borel, Linear Algebraic Groups, Corr. 18.3. (This is probably the piece of information you were missing).

Then it follows that $N$ is $GL_n(K)$-invariant, as claimed.

link|flag
This helps a lot, thank you. – spelas Mar 7 2011 at 22:48

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.