MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there an infinite (edit: but finitely generated) group G such that for all g in G, |g| is finite?

If so, how many such groups exist?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as too localized by Ryan Budney, J.C. Ottem, Ian Agol, Felipe Voloch, Pete L. Clark Mar 5 '11 at 21:12

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The direct sum of infinitely many copies of $\mathbb Z_2$. – Ryan Budney Mar 5 '11 at 20:12
Edit to specify "infinite finitely generated group"? Anyone? – Elizabeth S. Q. Goodman Mar 5 '11 at 20:24
Yes, Grigorchuk group is a finitely generated infinite 2-group. I.e, for each $g\in G$ there is an $n$ such that g^(2^n)=1. – Niyazi Mar 5 '11 at 21:00
up vote 19 down vote accepted

Yes, as per Ryan's comment you can just take an infinite direct sum of finite groups. However the more interesting problem is: are there (infinite) $\textit{finitely generated}$ groups with all elements of finite order?

The answer to this was open for a long time, but it is indeed yes. In fact this was known as Burnside's problem

The first examples were given by Golod & Shafarevich.

There is a lot of info on the wikipedia page

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice answer, +1. Nitpicky requests: will you edit to say you want your groups to be infinite cardinality, and remove the "alot"? (…) – Elizabeth S. Q. Goodman Mar 5 '11 at 20:23
Done. In general, though, let's not worry about such picayune errors. I recommend a good dose of Language Log to those who worry alot about correct grammer and spelling. ;-) – Todd Trimble Mar 5 '11 at 20:56
Heh, thanks. I care a lot more about the precision in math than grammar on this forum, but I couldn't resist the addition; my genuine-linguist friends have as yet failed to convince me that prescriptivism is always bad. – Elizabeth S. Q. Goodman Mar 5 '11 at 21:02
Elizabeth, even so, there's a huge difference between a grammatical error and a typographical error. – HJRW Mar 6 '11 at 6:27

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.