The standard reference for the statement that "any abstract variety is an open subscheme of a complete variety" is Nagata's 1962 paper Imbedding of an abstract variety in a complete variety. Unfortunately, this paper was apparently written before the language of schemes became standard, and uses Nagata's own language for "algebraic geometry over a Dedekind domain." Does anyone know of a translation of this proof (or another of the same statement) into scheme-theoretic language (or other language more comprehensible to the contemporary reader)?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
7
|
||||||
|
|
8
|
Apart from Brian's, published as: Deligne's notes on Nagata compactifications. J. Ramanujan Math. Soc. 22 (2007), no. 3, 205–257. there are: Lütkebohmert, On compactification of schemes. Manuscripta Math. 80 (1993), no. 1, 95–111. and Vojta: Nagata's embedding theorem, arXiv:0706.1907 and, finally Deligne: Le théorème de plongement de Nagata, Kyoto J. Math. 50, Number 4 (2010), 661-670. All of them are worth reading. The issue is certainly subtle and important, at least for cohomological constructions. |
||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
6
|
Brian Conrad has a writeup on this: |
||
|
|

