MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider the family of operators $T_\delta$, $\delta \geq 0$, defined on $\mathbb{R}^n$ by

$ \widehat{T_\delta f}(\xi) = (1-|\xi|^2)_+^\delta \widehat{f}(\xi). $

($(1-|\xi|^2)_+^\delta$ are known as Bochner-Riesz multipliers.) We are interested in the $L^p$ boundedness of $T_\delta$. The case $\delta = 0$ has been solved since 1971, once Fefferman provided a proof that $L^p$ boundedness fails in dimension $n \geq 2$ when $p \neq 2$. For general $\delta > 0$, a Theorem due to Herz shows that a necessary condition for boundedness is that

$ |\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2}| < \frac{2\delta + 1}{2n}. $

It's thus natural for one to conjecture that this is also a sufficient condition.

Here's what I think I know about current progress, from jotted down notes:

  • Holds for $n \leq 2$
  • Holds for $p = 2$
  • $T_\delta$ is bounded when $\delta > \frac{n-1}{2}$ (by Young's inequality)
  • $T_\delta$ is bounded when $|\frac{1}{p}-\frac{1}{2}| < \frac{\delta}{n-1}$
  • Holds if $\delta > \frac{n-1}{2(n+1)}$ (Can't remember the reference)
  • Holds for $n \geq 3$ when $p \geq \frac{2(n+2)}{n}$ or $p \leq \frac{2(n+2)}{n+4}$ (Found in Tao's Recent progress on the Restriction conjecture)

Question: What is the most recent progress on this conjecture? I'm curious about the general case and also specific values of $n$, such as $n = 3$.

share|cite|improve this question

The results stated in your post are improved in the recent work of Bourgain and Guth, in dimensions 5 and higher. The numerology is the same as for the restriction problem for the sphere (see the statement of theorem 1 in that paper). In the case of the restriction problem for the sphere Bourgain and Guth improved the 3 dimensional result to $p > 3 + 3/10=3.3$, which is slightly better than the $p>10/3=3.333...$ from Tao's bilinear estimates (which, combined with Lee's work, gives the corresponding result for Bochner-Riesz.) This is the "same" $p>10/3$ you mention in your post. It seems likely that Bourgain and Guth's argument will give a similar improvement for the 3 dimensional Bochner-Riesz problem, but they do not work this out in the paper. They do write (page 5) "Thus in principle, one could expect the proof of Theorem 2 to carry over and lead to the validity of the Bochner-Riesz conjecture for $max(p, p′) ≥ 3 +3/10$ , if n = 3. We do not pursue the details of this matter here."

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.