MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).
4

This is a problem I encountered in Martin Isaacs' 'Finite Group Theory'. It's located at the end of Chapter II which deals with subnormality, and the particular paragraph is concerned with a couple of not so well-known results which I quote for reference:

(In what follows $F$ is the Fitting subgroup)

Theorem (Zenkov)
Let $A$ and $B$ be abelian subgroups of the finite group G, and let $M$ be a minimal (in the sense of containment) member of the set {$A \cap B^g : g \in G$}. Then $M\subseteq F(G)$.

An easy corollary follows which establishes the existence of a subnormal subgroup:

Corollary
If $A$ is an abelian subgroup of the finite group $G$ and $|A|\geq|G:A|$, then $A \cap F(G)>1$.

In fact, if $A$ is cyclic, then a normal subgroup is guaranteed:

Theorem (Lucchini)
Let A be a cyclic proper subgroup of a finite group G, and let $K=core_G(A)$. Then $|A:K|<|G:A|$, and in particular, if $|A|\geq|G:A|$, then $K>1$.

Problem
Let G be a finite group such that $G=AN$, where $A$ is abelian, $N \unlhd G$, $C_A(N)=1$ and $F(N)=1$. Show that $|A|<|N|$.

Note that, since $N \unlhd G$, it follows that $F(N)= N \cap F(G)$. So, if $|A|\geq|N|$ in the problem, then $|A|\geq|N:N \cap A|=|NA:A|=|G:A|$ and the corollary applies to give $A \cap F(G)>1$.

How does one proceed from here to obtain a contradiction? In particular, how can the condition on the centralizer be utilized effectively?

flag
I'm not sure this is the right site to visit for this kind of question, which is somewhat advanced but based on a textbook problem. I hope it's not a homework problem. (The issue would be different if you thought you found a serious gap or error in a published proof. Anyway, Isaacs himself is still active in mathematics and could be consulted in that case.) – Jim Humphreys Feb 17 2011 at 18:17

1 Answer

2

You were almost there: Since $N$ and $F(G)$ are two normal subgroups intersecting trivially, they commute. But now take a non-trivial element $a \in A \cap F(G)$; then by the previous observation, $a$ commutes with every element of $N$. But this contradicts the fact that $C_A(N) = 1$.

link|flag
Indeed. What if we replace the condition on the Fitting subgroup with the requirement that A and N have relatively prime orders. Is it still true that |A|<|N|? – the_fox Feb 20 2011 at 23:15
Yes: if $A$ is a $\pi$-group (where $\pi$ is a set of primes), then the fact that $A \cap F(G) > 1$ gives $A \cap O_\pi(G) > 1$. Now proceed as in the previous problem with $F(G)$ replaced by $O_\pi(G)$. – Tom De Medts Feb 21 2011 at 13:19

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.