16
$\begingroup$

This question came up yesterday during our index theory seminar.

Let $M$ be a 1-connected smooth manifold and let $E \to M$ be a finite-rank complex vector bundle over $M$. If all the Chern classes of $E$ vanish, what else can one say about $E$? In other words, is there an alternative characterisation of such $E$?

(For a similar question in the case of $M$ having nontrivial fundamental group, see this previous question.)

$\endgroup$
10
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ A somewhat tautological but perhaps useful answer: A vector bundle given by $M \to BU$ has trivial Chern classes precisely when it lifts to the homotopy fibre of $BU \to \prod_n K(Z,2n)$ given by the Chern classes. $\endgroup$ Feb 15, 2011 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ In the holomorphic world the general answer is "not much" without some kind of stability condition (e.g., take direct sums of line bundles.) But if your $E$ is stable, with respect to some polarization (I'm assuming $M$ projective also), then, since $M$ is $1$-connected, it will be trivial (Donaldson-Uhlenbeck, IIRC). (But maybe this is orthogonal to your real question, sorry.) $\endgroup$
    – inkspot
    Feb 15, 2011 at 20:41
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "take direct sums of line bundles"? It should be an example of what? $\endgroup$
    – diverietti
    Feb 15, 2011 at 22:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Correction: $c_n$ on $S^{2n}$ has to be divisible by $(n-1)!$ (Bott). So the map isn't surjective on $\pi_6$. But it is still $5$-connected, and bundles with zero Chern classes are trivial in dimensions $\leq 4$. $\endgroup$ Feb 16, 2011 at 0:18
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Let me try to redeem myself by pointing to a paper by Boyer et al (Algebraic cycles and infinite loop spaces, Invent. Math. 113) where they show that there is an infinite loop space structure on $\prod_nK/Z,2n)$ making $BU \to \prod_nK/Z,2n)$ an infinite loop space map so that in particular its homotopy fibre gives a cohomology theory (or better yet the homotopy fibre of the map from connective K-theory). $\endgroup$ Feb 17, 2011 at 19:04

1 Answer 1

20
$\begingroup$

Since no one has mentioned it yet, let me point out one possibly interesting observation. If the base manifold $M$ is compact and has no torsion in its integral cohomology, then a vector bundle $E$ with vanishing Chern classes is stably trivial. This was pointed out to me by Robert Lipshitz. The reason is as follows: from looking at the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence, one can see that there can't be any torsion in the complex K-theory of $M$. Looking at the Chern character, one concludes that $[E]$ must be trivial in $\widetilde{K}^0(M)$, i.e. $E$ is stably trivial.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ By the way, I've been told (and it fits with the evidence) that Bott was always very interested in determining whether the (co)homology of various spaces was torsion-free. I never really knew why that was such an interesting thing to prove, but the statement above strikes me as one very nice consequence of torsion-free-ness. $\endgroup$
    – Dan Ramras
    Apr 1, 2011 at 2:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Would you mind saying a few more words about how you deduce that $K(M)$ is torsion-free? I can see that the torsion-free condition on cohomology implies that all the terms on the $E_2$ page of the Atiyah-Hirzebruch spectral sequence are free abelian groups of finite rank, but I guess I don't know enough about the differentials. A priori, there could be some non-trivial differential $d^r : E^{p,q}_r \to E^{p+r,q-r+1}_r$ with $r$ odd whose image has finite index in $\operatorname{ker}(d^r : E^{p+r,q-r+1}_r \to E^{p+2r,q-2r+2}_r)$. $\endgroup$ May 4, 2022 at 1:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Basically the point is that we know a priori that ranks of $K^0 (M)$ and $K^1 (M)$ equal the total ranks of the even and odd degree cohomology groups (respectively), and these total ranks also agree with the total rank of the $E^2$ terms on the relevant anti-diagonals. A non-trivial differential anywhere in the spectral sequence would decrease the total rank on one of these lines, hence would decrease the total rank of $K^*(M)$. Kristen Hendricks wrote out the argument in detail: arxiv.org/abs/1107.2154, Prop. 6.10. See also Section 2.5 of the original Atiyah-Hirzebruch article. $\endgroup$
    – Dan Ramras
    May 6, 2022 at 3:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks. I was missing the fact that we could use the Chern character to deduce the ranks on the $E_{\infty}$ page. $\endgroup$ May 6, 2022 at 11:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.