Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

f is uni-variate polynomial of degree d. I am interested in lower bounding modulus first derivative of f (i.e. |f'|)in interval [a,b] given the promise that in interval [a,b] f' don't have any root.

Like in Markoff theorem..to upper bound first derivative of polynomial in open interval (a,b) is
|f'(x)|<=(2*M*d*d)/(b-a) where M is upper bound of f in (a,b),but I don't know proof of this theorem.

I know polynomial f i.e. its coefficient,degree and upper bound as well as lower bound of f in interval [a,b], Now I want to lower bound f' in [a,b] in terms of these terms..say like Markoff theorem.

Pls let me know whether this time I able to put my question clearly :)

Thanks Ram

share|improve this question
How about using the Mean Value Theorem, if you know the values of f at some points? –  Yemon Choi Feb 13 '11 at 7:16
that would go in recursion of finding min of till d-th derivative of f e.g. min|f'|= min{f'(a),f'(b),min{f'(c)}} where c is root of f" and f"(c)>=0 I need much cleaner approach like "Markoff Theorem" –  Ram Feb 13 '11 at 10:32
Ram, you misunderstood me. If you know the minimum value of p, call it $M$, and you know some other value of p, call it $K>M$, then the mean value theorem tells you that there exists u in your interval such that $K-M \leq |f'(u)|(b-a)$. I agree with all the other commenters that your original question may not admit an answer; just because you want such a bound to exist, that is not a reason to expect such a bound to exist. –  Yemon Choi Feb 14 '11 at 0:30

5 Answers 5

I think you need to be a bit more precise. For example, choose any polynomial $g(x)$ that does not vanish on $[a,b]$, let $f'(x)=(x-a+\epsilon)g(x)$, let $F(x)$ be an antiderivative of $f'(x)$, and let $f(x)=F(x)+C$ for some constant $C$. Choosing $\epsilon$ small, you can make $f'(a)=\epsilon g(a)$ small, while choosing an appropriate $C$, you can make $\sup |f(x)|$ or $\inf |f(x)|$ on the interval $[a,b]$ to be anything that you want. So it's really not clear what sort of lower bound you have in mind.

share|improve this answer

This is basically repeating what Joe Silverman wrote, in a concrete example. (I do so, as a misunderstanding between asker and answerers seems to persist.)

It might be difficult (or impossible) to get a lower bound similar to the upper bound. Let us fix the interval $[0,1]$.

  1. For $x^2$ the derivative is $0$ in $0$, and this polynomial is thus not admissible by your question.

  2. For $(x+0.001)^2$ the derivative is $0.002$ in $0$, so very small, and this polynomial is admissible by your question.

  3. For $(x+1)^2$ the derivative is $2$ in $0$, so not too small.

So, one would need to distinguish 2 and 3. With this example one could still guess this might be due to the fact that in 2 the polynomial is small at 0. But replacing $(x+0.001)^2$ by 2'. $(x+0.001)^2 + 1$ the minimum is not too small anymore and just looking at rough parameters like maximum and minimum on the interval the polynomials 2' and 3 are not that different. While they are very different with respect to what you are looking for.

Thus, if a bound of the form you are looking for exists, it seems it definitely has to take into account other/finer quantities than maximum/minimum and degree. (I know you do not restrict exclusively to this situation, so this is not a full answer; but is meant to provide some 'bound' on what one can hope for.)

share|improve this answer

As already discussed the answer to the question, as stated, is NO. However, one can get close if one is willing to go to a measure theoretic statement. For example, the statement $$ |\{x \in [a,b]:\quad |f'(x)| < \varepsilon\}| \to 0 $$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$, is an easy consequence of continuity. However, one can quantify this. If I remember correctly, it is relatively easy to prove $$ |\{x \in [a,b]:\quad |f'(x)| < \varepsilon\}| \leq C \varepsilon^{1/d} $$ where $C$ is an (universal) constant and $d$ the degree of the polynomial $f$. I think one can give a proof by just rescaling Polya's inequality.

share|improve this answer

Okay, here goes:

1. Calculate the coefficients $\langle c_j : j\in d\rangle$ of the degree d-1 polynomial f'.

2. Run quantifier elimination over real closed fields on the formulas

$((\displaystyle\bigwedge_{j\in d} ((a \leq x_j) \land (x_j \leq b))) \implies$ $(((((\displaystyle\sum_{j\in n} 1)\cdot (\displaystyle\sum_{j\in d} (c_j \cdot (\displaystyle\prod_{j\in d} x_j))))+1) \leq 0) \lor (1 \leq ((\displaystyle\sum_{j\in n} 1)\cdot (\displaystyle\sum_{j\in d} (c_j \cdot (\displaystyle\prod_{j\in d} x_j))))))$

until the result is $ \; (0 = 0) \; $.

3. $\frac1n$ is now a lower bound for $|f'|$ in the interval $[a,b]$.

share|improve this answer

We have the following inegalities :

$c_1 n (k+1) \leq \sup_{0 \neq f \in \mathcal P_{k,n}} \frac{ \| f' \|_{[-1,1]} }{ \| f \|_{[-1,1]} } \leq c_2 n (k+1)$

Where $c_1 > 0$, $c_2 > 0$ are absolute constants and $\mathcal P_{k,n}$ is the set of all polynomials of degree at most $n$ with real coecients and with at most $k$ ($0 \leq k \leq n$) zeros in the open unit disk.

share|improve this answer
Do you know examples of $c_1$ and $c_2$ that work for that? –  Ricky Demer Feb 12 '11 at 11:31
We can find them (and proof) in the book : "Polynomials and polynomial inequalities" By Peter B. Borwein,Tamás Erdélyi. –  Ilies Zidane Feb 17 '11 at 19:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.