I am confused with morphisms of supermanifolds. Take a simple example $f:R^{0|1}\to R^{0|1}$. By (one of) definition, $f$ is a morphism of superalgebras of functions $C(R^{0|1})\to C(R^{0|1})$. Morphisms of superalgebras preserve the grading, I deduced that $f$ have the form $1\mapsto 1, \theta\mapsto x\theta$, i.e. $Hom(R^{0|1}\to R^{0|1})=R^1$ (as a set?). But I read from a paper that $Hom(R^{0|1},R^{0|1})=R^{1|1}$. What is going on? Thanks in advance!
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
2
1
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
You are right that the set of supermanifold morphisms $Hom(\mathbb R^{0|1},\mathbb R^{0|1})$ to itself is $\mathbb R^1$. However, one can define for supermanifolds $X,Y$ with $\dim X=0|d$ a supermanifold $map(X,Y)$ of morphisms from $X$ to $Y$, by $Hom(Z,map(X,Y))=Hom(Z\times X,Y)$ for all supermanifolds $Z$. And $map(\mathbb R^{0|1},\mathbb R^{0|1})=\mathbb R^{1|1}$. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
1
|
@Ma: As an answer to your following question:
Take a look at arXiv:math/0307303, where this question is discussed. For $d=1$, it is well-known (and due to Kontsevich, I think), that $map(R^{0|1},M)$ is the total space of the odd tangent bundle $\Pi TM$ of $M$. If $U$ is a superdomain of dimension $p|q$, then $map(R^{0|d},U)=U\times R^{pr+qs|ps+qr}$ where $(r+1)|s=2^{d-1}|2^{d-1}$ is the graded dimension of $\bigwedge R^d$. This you can check using the definition of $map$ and the characterisation of morphisms of supermanifolds as given in Leites. Another good source on this subject (for $d=1$), is the paper "Differential forms and 0-dimensional supersymmetric field theories" by Hohnhold, Kreck, Stolz and Teichner. |
|||
|
|

