Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For any integer $r \geq 2$, et $V_r$ be the set of polynomials $Q \in {\mathbb Q}[X]$ of degree $r-1$ such that there is an algebraic number $\alpha$ of degree $r$ , such that $Q(\alpha)$ is a conjugate of $\alpha$. It is not hard to see that $V_2$ consists exactly of $X$ and all the polynomials $a_0-X$, for $a_0\in {\mathbb Q}$. Have the $V_r(r \geq 3)$ been studied? Is anything known about $V_3$ ?

share|improve this question
4  
Maybe I am missing something simple, but why is $x+1\in V_2$? –  Tim Dokchitser Jan 28 '11 at 14:10
    
In order for $ax + b \in V_2$ it is necessary that $(a+1)\alpha + b \in \mathbb{Q}$, where $\alpha$ is the algebraic number in question. Thus, it is necessary that $a = -1$. This shows that $\alpha$ is a root of $x^2 - b + c$, for some $c \in \mathbb{Q}$. In order that $\deg \alpha = 2$ it is necessary and sufficient that $(b^2 - 4c)$ not be a square. Thus $V_2$ consists of the polynomials $b-x$ for all $b \in mathbb{Q}$. –  Victor Miller Jan 28 '11 at 16:15
    
if g(x)=x+1 for an element g of the galois group, then g^n(x)=x+n... Cannot be. –  Yaakov Baruch Jan 28 '11 at 16:21
    
@Tim, Vicro and Yaakov : I corrected the equality for $V_2$ in the OP. –  Ewan Delanoy Jan 28 '11 at 16:46

2 Answers 2

up vote 14 down vote accepted

$\newcommand\Z{\mathbf{Z}}$ $\newcommand\Q{\mathbf{Q}}$

If we replace $\alpha$ by $\alpha + \lambda$ for $\lambda \in \Q$ (translation), we may replace $Q(X)$ by $Q(X - \lambda) + \lambda$. Similarly, if we replace $\alpha$ by $\mu \cdot \alpha$ (dilation), we may replace $Q(X)$ by $\mu \cdot Q(X/\mu)$.

Let's discuss the case $[\Q(\alpha):\Q] = 3$. By translation, we may assume that the coefficient of $X$ is trivial. By dilation, we may assume that the leading coefficient is $1$ (this specifically uses the fact that we are in degree $3$). Hence $Q(X) = X^2 + c$ for some $c \in \Q$.

If a degree $3$ field $K = \Q(\alpha)$ contains at least two conjugates of $\alpha$ then it contains all the conjugates, and is therefore Galois with cyclic Galois group. Thus $Q$ induces an isomorphism of $K$ of order three, and $\alpha$ must be a root of $Q(Q(Q(X))) - X$ but not a root of $Q(X) -X$. Hence it is a root of $F(X) = (Q(Q(Q(X))) - X)/(Q(X) - X)$, which is an explicit degree $6$ polynomial.

Suppose that $\beta = u + v \sqrt{d}$ is a root of $F(X)$, where $u$ and $v$ are rational and $d$ is not a square. We may write $F(u + v \sqrt{d}) = R(u,v) + S(u,v) \sqrt{d}$, where $R$ and $S$ are polynomials with coefficients in $\Q[a,b]$. Since $F(\beta) = 0$, then $R(u,v) = S(u,v) = 0$. Computing the resultant of these polynomials with respect to $c$, we obtain the equation: $$(1 + 2 u^2 + 4 u^2)(-1 - 18 u + 4u^2 + 8 u^3) v = 0.$$ Since $u$ is rational, it follows that $v = 0$. Thus $F(X)$ does not have any genuine quadratic solutions, and hence $F(X)$ has no factors that are quadratic. (If we assume that $F(X)$ has a cubic factor, we can prove this in a slightly cleaner way. Since $F(X)$ has a cubic factor, it has at most one quadratic factor. Yet $Q(\beta)$ and $Q(Q(\beta))$ are also quadratic roots of $F(X)$, and hence either $Q(\beta) = \beta$ or $Q(\beta) = \sigma \beta$. Both possibilities are impossible.)

We are assuming that $F(X)$ has a cubic factor corresponding to $\alpha$. Then either $F(X)$ factors as a product of two cubics, or as a cubic times three linear factors. In either case, the cubics correspond to fields which are Galois and hence cyclic of degree three. Hence the discriminant of $F(X)$ is a square (easy exercise). We compute explicitly that $$\Delta_F = - (7 + 4 c)^3 (7 + 4 c + 16 c^2)^2,$$ and hence we deduce the necessary relation: $$7 + 4 c = - t^2$$ for some $t \in \Q$. Making the substitution $c = (-7 - t^2)/4$, the polynomial $2^{6} \cdot F(X)$ factors as $A(X,t) A(X,-t)$, where $$A(X,t) = 1 + 7 t - t^2 + t^3 + 18 x - 4 t x + 2 t^2 x - 4 x^2 - 4 t x^2 - 8 x^3.$$ As long as either this polynomial or its cousin $A(X,-t)$ are irreducible, we obtain a cubic with a root $\alpha$ such that $Q(\alpha)$ is a conjugate of $\alpha$. The polynomial $A(X,t)$ is reducible in $t$ if and only if there exists a rational point $A(X,t) = 0$. This turns out to be a rational curve, and we deduce that it is reducible if and only if there exists a $u \in \Q$ such that $$t = \frac{1 + 2 u - u^2 - u^3}{u(u+1)}.$$ On the other hand, $A(X,-t)$ is reducible if and only if there exists a $v \in \Q$ such that $$-t = \frac{1 + 2 v - v^2 - v^3}{v(v+1)}.$$ Hence any forbidden $t$ corresponds to a solution to the equation $$\frac{1 + 2 u - u^2 - u^3}{u(u+1)} = - \frac{1 + 2 v - v^2 - v^3}{v(v+1)},$$ which correspond to points on the curve $$C:u + u^2 + v + 4 u v + u^2 v - u^3 v + v^2 + u v^2 - 2 u^2 v^2 - u^3 v^2 - u v^3 - u^2 v^3 = 0.$$ This curve is smooth in the affine locus. The corresponding projective curve has three points at $\infty$, and two of the corresponding points are singular.

The singularities at these points are nodes (I think), and thus using Plücker's formula, we deduce that $C$ has genus: $$ g = (d-1)(d-2)/2 - n = (4 \cdot 3)/2 - 2 =4.$$ Thus $C$ has finitely many rational points (Faltings). (Note: this calculation may have been wrong, but we won't actually use it.) The curve $C$ has some obvious points at $\infty$ and when $u(u+1)v(v+1) = 0$. Make the substitution $u = x+y$ and $v = x-y$. Then the equation becomes: $$-x - 3 x^2 - x^3 + 2 x^4 + x^5 + y^2 + x y^2 - 2 x^2 y^2 - 2 x^3 y^2 + x y^4 = 0.$$ This is a quadratic in $y^2$. Hence we obtain a degree two covering $C \rightarrow E$, where $E$ is the curve $$E:-x - 3 x^2 - x^3 + 2 x^4 + x^5 + z + x z - 2 x^2 z - 2 x^3 z + x z^2 = 0.$$ Given a rational point on this curve, the discriminant $\Delta$ is rational, and hence $E$ is isomorphic to: $$\Delta^2 = 4(4 x^4 + 3 x^3 + x^2 + 2 x + 1) = 4(1+x)(1+2x)(1-x+2x^2)$$ This is birational to an elliptic curve which turns out to have conductor $112$. Cremona's program mwrank tells me has Mordell-Weil group $\Z/2\Z$. Hence the only rational points correspond to $x = -1/2$ and $x = -1$, which pull back to the "obvious" rational points on $C$. Hence we have determined $C(\Q)$ completely, and we see that one of $A(X,t)$ or $A(X,-t)$ is always irreducible. Hence we deduce:

If $\alpha$ is a cubic irrationality with $Q(\alpha) = \sigma \alpha \ne \alpha$, then, replacing $\alpha$ by $\lambda \alpha + \mu$, $Q(X)$ is of the form: $$Q(X) = X^2 - \frac{7+t^2}{4}$$ with $t \in \Q$. Conversely, for any such $Q(X)$, there exists a cubic irrationality $\alpha$ such that $\sigma \alpha = Q(\alpha)$.

Example: $t = 1$, and $Q(X) = X^2 - 2$. Then $\alpha = 2 \cos(2 \pi/7)$.

For higher degree polynomials, things will be even more of a mess, because there will be various possibilities corresponding to what the Galois closure is, &. &. The answer will have the following flavor: It will correspond to the rational points on a bunch of varieties minus rational points on subvarieties corresponding to degeneracies (which in this case turn out to be empty).

share|improve this answer
    
"This question should probably be tagged nt.number-theory" Done. –  Andres Caicedo Jan 29 '11 at 0:00
    
Nice. I don't see the need for paragraph 4; if $\alpha$ is degree 3, as we are assuming, then it obviously can't be $u+v\sqrt d$, which is of degree 2. –  Gerry Myerson Jan 29 '11 at 5:06
    
Brilliant answer. –  Ewan Delanoy Jan 29 '11 at 5:58

If $f(x)$ is in $V_r$, and $g(x)$ is the minimal polynomial of a corresponding element $\alpha$, then $f(\alpha)$ is also a root of $g(x)$, so $g(f(\alpha))=0$; hence $g(x)$ divides $g(f(x))$. Thus, $V_r$ consists of the polynomials $f(x)\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$ of degree $r-1$ for which there is an irreducible degree-$r$ polynomial $g(x)\in\mathbb{Q}[x]$ satisfying $g(x)\mid g(f(x))$. This perspective explains the result for $r=2$: the map $\beta\mapsto f(\beta)$ must permute the two roots of $g(x)$, and the only linear polynomials which permute two numbers are $x$ and $a_0-x$ (this doesn't quite show $a_0-x\in V_2$, one has to finish as Victor did).

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.