Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

We've all heard it. I even got it in Norwegian recently. It's number 1 on the list of responses to the statement "I'm a mathematician.". Does anyone have any good comebacks? What other responses have you heard?

Standard community wiki rules (not that anyone seems to take any notice of them): one answer per post please. Also, no snide comebacks, please - keep it nice. Extra kudos for answers that would actually educate the other person.

share|improve this question

closed as no longer relevant by Loop Space, Reid Barton, Charles Siegel, Kevin H. Lin, Pete L. Clark Feb 11 '10 at 4:58

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
I have closed the question. I think it has run its course, and for MO to succeed we need to continually move ahead to new questions. –  Pete L. Clark Feb 11 '10 at 5:00
1  
What do we do if we have something to add - repost? –  Dr Shello Jan 3 '11 at 1:29
    
Or add answers as comments, I suppose... –  Dr Shello Jan 3 '11 at 1:31
    
The stronger I bear in mind that my goal is to connect with someone and not to defend maths, the better I do. I look for any possible response except disagreeing with them. Also—someone who hates "maths" doesn't hate "representation theory" or "topology". "I think about knots all day" sounds much better than "Every day of my life is like the homework you hated". If it must be broached, I would emphasise the total lack of overlap between what I love and what they were forced to do as a youth. –  isomorphismes Feb 15 at 8:47

22 Answers 22

  • Tell me more about your last teacher …
share|improve this answer
10  
Inevitably I find that all of my mathematically challenged but otherwise intelligent friends can trace their problems to bad math teachers - often a single one. –  Qiaochu Yuan Nov 13 '09 at 18:40
    
I asked a followup question here: mathoverflow.net/questions/5497/… –  Jon Awbrey Nov 14 '09 at 13:34
1  
@ Minhyong Kim : (I have to reply here because the MObot won't let me add a comment anywhere else). My answer is of course a take-off on the stereotypical inquiry of a psychological counselor — either that or a line from Blade Runner. The purpose of a probe like that is not to assign blame — there is neither maieusis nor cure of souls in that — it's aim is simply to initiate the process of anamnesis. –  Jon Awbrey Nov 16 '09 at 2:06
2  
Hopefully it won't continue like it did in Blade Runner, if I remember the context of that line correctly. –  Harrison Brown Nov 16 '09 at 3:08
1  
@ Harrison Ford, er, Brown : Well, yes, some anamneses catalyze bigger breakthroughs than others. –  Jon Awbrey Nov 16 '09 at 12:40

Yes, I understand your shame. I was never very good at [pick a topic at which you struggle], and it seems a pity to me to be so inept.

share|improve this answer
7  

You were in school? How is it?

share|improve this answer
14  
That appears rude to me. –  Boris Bukh Nov 13 '09 at 18:49
3  
A possible variant would be: - What about reading? Did you felt the same way about it? Because both are extremely important to understand the world. –  Manuel Silva Nov 14 '09 at 2:44
1  
I mean the q. naively: Schools seem to influence people's mentality much and in various ways, so I'd like to know how it is. Usually the following discussion become interesting. –  Thomas Riepe Nov 14 '09 at 10:19

"Neither was I." True story. In fact, I'm still not very good at math; but I can trust it.

share|improve this answer
14  
I regularly get a laugh out of my classes when I say (usually early in the semester) that I'm not very good with numbers. –  Ryan Budney Nov 13 '09 at 17:43

Like Scott Carter, I sometimes say something like: "I was never any good at [e.g.] writing essays..."

"I was never any good at math(s)" always makes me feel funny because usually the speaker is angling for some kind of commiseration which I simply cannot provide. So I try to change the subject as quickly as possible.

share|improve this answer
2  
That's a bit harsh. I think most speakers are suddenly taken outside their frame of reference, and are unconsciously making excuses in advance if they are unable to get talking about the usual small-talk –  Yemon Choi Nov 13 '09 at 18:50
1  
Sure, it could be seen as a way to make small talk, but I usually detect an undercurrent of shame in it, which I find embarrassing. I'm still not sure what's the most appropriate way to deal with this shame, at least in a cocktail-party setting. –  John Goodrick Nov 13 '09 at 23:06

What other responses have you heard?

"Oh, I used to be good at math. (often followed by) I never made it to Calculus, though"

In some sense, this response is more annoying given that the individual saying this is often more certain that their (false) understanding of what "mathematics is" is in fact what "mathematics is." And there is somehow an implication that mathematics is nothing more than a college Calculus class.

share|improve this answer

"Why Nerds are Unpopular" by Paul Graham has some interesting points if someone wants to discuss how someone can be good at technical subjects.

Generally, I just take it in stride that a lot of people in the world think Math is this horrible horrible thing that they had to endure in a way that was almost like torture. I don't agree with that but I can understand how for some Math is an extremely hard subject as I had difficulties with various Arts classes for many years. My struggle is that while the teacher would say, "Oh just write what you want," or "Just draw what you want," this often had some ulterior point that wasn't communicated and when I'd get back the grade that was a 6/10 or 12/20 and I'd want to know what I did wrong, the teacher couldn't really offer specific points that I could use. Luckily I had a high school English teacher give me the algorithm for an essay that finally fixed a lot of my issues so I would start getting As in English as opposed to the C- or D I had been getting previously.

If the situation is where one can have a serious deep discussion, it can be interesting to hear the various horror or war stories that people have in Math classes. I find Math to be that rare subject where it is mostly Application and not knowledge or comprehension like other elementary school subjects.

For a final thought on this subject, I tend to find those that pursue academics to be the social outcasts in school. If most adults think good grades are something that is worthwhile and a good thing, how about rewarding that to the same degree that artistic and athletic abilities get rewarded in modern times? Artistic abilities would include the child actors or singers that can become rather famous for how this can be packaged and marketed. Child athletes are common in some sports like Gymnastics but there are also various team sports where one can become famous or popular for having some talent and combined it with a skill that has been worked. I will admit that even after being out of school for a number of years this still brings up bitter memories and confusing thoughts about what is the point of our education system in North America at times. Anyway, I think that I've rambled enough to have given some thoughts on this subject here.

share|improve this answer

The tricky thing about that response is that there's often some pride in not being good at math, perhaps because they've gotten so far with out having to know any math (so they must be pretty good, right?). More often than not, what the person is getting at is that they were right when they said to themselves in grade school "I'm never going to need this."

I size the person up, and if I think the answer will be an emphatic "YES", I respond with something like, "but you can read, right?" Then I try to draw a parallel between math and reading. Neither of them (in much quantity) is strictly necessary for getting by, or even to be successful, but if you read (or think mathematically) often, it enriches your life. At this point, their curiosity is usually piqued, so I'll try to steer the discussion to how your understanding of the world might be improved by thinking about probability, symmetry, or abstraction (depending on what I think will best engage the person). I try to get across that doing mathematics can be for pure enjoyment or curiosity with examples of interesting or counterintuitive elementary results.

share|improve this answer
    
Being illiterate is a much bigger drawback to life than being unable to do maths. This is a bad comparison. –  Turion May 14 at 16:06

There is at least one cathegory of people who always respond nicely to the statement that I am a mathematician. I live in UK but don't have a UK passeport so every time I come back here it is necessary to fill a security form on the border. In particular you need to write your profession and I write that I am mathematician. Security officers are always very curious when they read this and usually quite happy. Some of them would ask you to solve a problem, for example to prove that exp(i*pi)=-1. Others would give a matheamatical puzzle trying to cheat you. I advise you to try this once :)

share|improve this answer
12  
I've had funny experiences entering the UK, that way, too. Once at customs after saying I'm in the UK to give a few talks and visit some mathematicians, the customs agent asked "What is your talk about?" taken aback, not sure exactly what to say, my response was "embedding spheres in spheres". She let me go after that. –  Ryan Budney Nov 13 '09 at 19:03
3  
Interesting. I had the same experience flying from Dubai to Frankfurt. The costums in Dubai told me "So you can definitely calculate the square root of a big number".. I just laughed at that. –  Jose Capco Nov 14 '09 at 7:43

I think Papert's analysis is in order here. He makes a distinction between school mathematics, which he refers to as "math" (with a somewhat negative tone) and mathematics proper, which he refers to as "mathematics".

School mathematics is often robbed of intuition. Lakoff and Nunez in their book "Where Mathematics Comes From" makes the conjecture that all mathematics is embodied. I think this is quite the case, and as "math" is often taught with no intuition involved, it cannot be embodied in the true sense.

So I suppose I would say

I don't do math. I do mathematics. There's a difference.

And go from there.

share|improve this answer
2  
Wow. This answer may convince me to refer to my studies as "mathematics" instead of "math" as has long been my habit. –  Elizabeth S. Q. Goodman Nov 16 '09 at 9:57

Here's one that I've been willing to try out: Although I hear a lot of people say that, I don't think I have met many people who were truly not cut out for mathematics. The problem is more that most people haven't gotten the chance -- or given themselves the chance -- to get to know mathematics. If you can think logically, you can do mathematics.

I really believe this is true. So instead of taking their remark as an insult, try to do something constructive with it. Maybe apply the Socratic Method to make them solve a small problem. This might take part of the cause of their disrespect/lack of interest away.

share|improve this answer

I find a far more common response to "I'm a mathematician" is "So you deal with really big numbers, right?"

MLevi's answer suggested a lot of people believe mathematics ends at calculus. In my experience more people don't realise mathematics extends beyond some notion of complicated sequences of arithmetic.

To a few people who replied with this or similar I asked them what they really thought I did with my day:

"I suppose you wake up and do some sums, maybe?"

share|improve this answer
3  
As a large cardinal theorist, I can gleefully answer "yes" to that one. –  Norman Lewis Perlmutter Oct 9 '11 at 19:49

Despite my being a student, I still do receive responses similar to the response cited in the op. My response is usually, "Yes, but have you ever taken a real math class?" This usually results in some sort of explanation that mathematicians (most?) don't sit around doing calculus problems all day. Although, on at least one occasion, the person with whom I was speaking became very hostile at the suggestion that he did not know what real math was.

share|improve this answer
6  
Actually, most of the paper I'm finishing up right now involved sitting around and doing calculus problems all day :) –  Theo Johnson-Freyd Nov 20 '09 at 6:35

It seems to me that frequently people will say this because they find mathematics intimidating. I don't think they're trying to be rude.

I try to get the idea across that mathematics is not always as complicated as it seems. For instance, the average adult may not know the term "integration", but a child can easily count the number of squares underneath a curve.

share|improve this answer

It's hard to see this question as something specifically relevant to mathematics. That is, it sounds pretty much the same as asking `What are good ways of carrying on a conversation?' Of course there's no simple answer to that either. To the extent that I'm able to give anyone advice, I would simply call for general sympathy. If you've already established a reasonable dialogue, I don't see that the response you mention would have to carry any problematic connotations. For example, asking plenty of sincere questions about the other person's interests would be one easy way of eventually having a serious discussion about your own.

I would like to remark that the prevalence of a negative reaction to the mathematical profession appears to me greatly exaggerated. I can very honestly say I've never encountered it myself in any social situation. Unfavorable and unrealisic comparison to the arts appears with surprising frequency, as in Lockhart's Lament. But I wonder if such commentators have ever compared the income or employability of an average mathematician with that of an average artist, musician, or writer. My feeling is we are often misled by the fact that the stars in art, music, or literature are so much more prominent than their mathematical counterparts. I'd rather not do it now, but I believe it's rather easy to establish that mathematicians do very well on the average, and this is generally a good thing about the profession. Average status is alright, and we give our stars due respect without overinflating them. The absence of publically recognizable gloss keeps us humble enough to be suitably happy. One could say the same for academic apitutude in general, brought up in one of the answers above, which again is quite well-rewarded on the average. Muddled thinking surrounding 'creativity' has been detrimental to education in many ways, but it's really quite sad if the rhetoric keeps even my fellow mathematicians from recognizing their overall good fortune! (Incidentally, I won't go into them here, but I also have reasons to consider mathematicians especially fortunate even among academics.)

By the way, I really don't like the answers that suggest blaming former teachers. This is an unfortunately common and irresponsible response to a complex question. I don't want to express this in too harsh a manner, but I might ask Qiaochu if he'd heard the teachers' side of the story before reaching his conclusions. Most primary and secondary school teachers I know of are dedicated people working under frequently difficult circumstances, doing what they can to teach basic and necessary skills. Perhaps their own skills are not optimal, but neither are mine.

Maybe I should nevertheless conclude this ramble with a brief answer to the original question: With genuine sympathy, say `Oh, I'm sorry to hear that,' and proceed with good humor.

P.S. I apologize for the moralistic tone of this reply. My impression is many users of this site are quite young, and I'm still a Confucian at heart.

Added, 18 November:

I feel compelled to add a few comments given the seriousness of the topic. That is, I would like people to consider the possibility that many perceived problems arise simply because of the overwhelming importance of mathematics.

Jonah Sinick made a number of thoughtful comments in a separate email, and one point he brought up was that the math he learned prior to the university looks nothing like the kind he knows and loves now. This is probably true. But since the comparison with music or sports is made frequently, consider how much a beginner at the violin practicing the scales resembles a professional performing Beethoven. And then how about running around the field for hours to build up stamina vs. the antics of NBA players? Obviously, there are many things whose mastery requires patient tolerance of the basic skills. Why then so much more perceived difficulty with regard to mathematics? This is because the entire population must learn it to a certain level, much higher, for example, than typical violin skills. Society in general at present considers mathematics that important, and much of the dysfunction flows out of this situation. I leave it to you to imagine a scenario where every child had to perform basic violin pieces as well as basic arithmetic operations, regardless of their inclination or talent. And then imagine we needed as many violin teachers as teachers of mathematics.

I hope none of you wish to argue then that mathematics is in fact not so important as to require such massive social investment. This is not because it runs against our interest, but because that's a really difficult case to make in our modern age, and probably too long to fit into the margins of this webpage. In short, don't blame teachers, don't blame the children, don't blame mathematicians. Blame industrial civilization, if you're so inclined.

The main thing I find surprising in many such discussions is that everyone realizes playing the violin or basketball well requires many hours of boring practice that lead up to the joy that comes with the different levels of mastery. But mathematics, and perhaps some other academic subjects, are supposed to be constantly concerned with being 'fun'. And then, I don't see the violinists themselves viewing the lack of inspiration in scales as a fundamental problem.

Of course I hope as many teachers as possible are able to convey some real sense of joy in regard to the mathematics they teach, and various notions of creativity can be occasionally useful and inspiring. But given the sheer scale of the task at hand, I wouldn't hope for methodological ingenuity to bring about overall improvement at any easily measurable pace.

Yet another addition.

I realize as I reread my own paragraphs that I've been explaining mostly one side of the story. So I'm adding a link to a short article that attempts to present a more balanced perspective.

share|improve this answer
2  
"teachers I know of are dedicated people" That is an interesting observation, here in Germany (and I tutored really many future math teachers) many students intending to become math teachers express a very negative opinion on mathematics and excuse themself for going teaching it with rather modest causes. An even worse impression made some paedagogy professors on occasion of special courses (not only math) for motivated pupils. –  Thomas Riepe Nov 16 '09 at 9:25
7  
Well, I'll try to address this complex issue some other time. I'm afraid I have to object to one other view expressed here and there. What makes some of you think the 'math' people learned in school is 'not real'? Elementary arithmetic operations are among the great inventions of humankind. Ask yourselves how we're able to teach even children skills that were supremely difficult for smart people in ancient Greece. Once again, sorry for the didactic tone. –  Minhyong Kim Nov 16 '09 at 12:07
2  
Regarding your point about mastery and fun, I think a more fundamental misconception is that people think math is either something you're naturally good at or naturally bad at. –  Qiaochu Yuan Nov 20 '09 at 6:44
1  
Yes, that's true. But the effect of natural talent can't be entirely ignored at any level, even while we are aware that it comes in many varieties, even among great mathematicians. A good teacher might be able to bring almost everyone up to a certain level, and of course has to put in a true effort in many circumstances. How long it takes, how much pressure is necessary, indeed, how fun the process is (on both sides), will likely be influenced by talent (again on both sides). A sympathetic awareness of this aspect as well might be important in effective teaching. –  Minhyong Kim Nov 20 '09 at 8:42
1  
"What makes some of you think the 'math' people learned in school is 'not real'?" Just for that one line I would upvote your comment ten times if I could. For me it is extremely refreshing to hear a professional mathematician question that line. Thank you for that. –  Jesse Madnick Jun 29 '11 at 8:54

"I'm not much good at it either; I'm just much worse at everything else."

(or anything else in good humor). I don't think an admission from someone that she wasn't good at math in school, by itself, should be taken as an invitation to pedagogy, but if she shows genuine interest in what I do, then that's another matter.

share|improve this answer
1  
Why do you assume it's a she? –  Hiro Lee Tanaka Jun 20 '12 at 16:55
2  
@Hiro Lee Tanaka: I don't; I just needed a pronoun. Sorry, nothing was intended by it. –  Darsh Ranjan Jul 21 '12 at 22:08

I tend to respond with something along the lines of, "Well, that's a shame. I hope you found something you were good at?" I've found it's easier to interface with non-mathematicians if you're willing and able to talk about whatever it is they do, rather than hope that they'll be interested in what you do...

share|improve this answer

Pete Casazza discusses this briefly at the beginning of his article A Mathematician's Survival Guide, available here.

share|improve this answer
1  
That article is awesome! –  Dirk Mar 7 '12 at 20:22

"Mathematics is a very different subject if you learn interesting topics from someone who really likes it. Then you don't have it be all that good at it to like it too."

That may get to the heart of the matter in many cases. When someone says, "I was never much good at math in school," the typical implication is, "and that's why I don't like it." Yes, most people who say that aren't trying to be rude. Regardless, it is a little rude to imply that you're bored with someone else's profession, before he or she even says anything about it. Still, it's a mistake to be rude in response. The best I can do discuss math in the same terms as music (or even point out the analogy). I have never been much good at music, but of course I still like to listen to it.

I understand Minhyong Kim's point that it's always easy and often wrong to blame past teachers. I maintain that many grade school teachers don't like mathematics, however hard they may work and however much they might like children or teaching. They can't help but teach their feelings along with the material. (A suspect version of the material.) I don't mean to blame all of them. I know grade-school teachers who really do like mathematics. Yet there are others who openly tell their students that they didn't like math. It also doesn't help to have debased calculus classes with huge enrollments at universities — not all blame is at the grade school level.

Anyway, this opening sometimes buys me time to also say something about what I study.

share|improve this answer
1  
It's interesting. Pretty much everyone I know would agree that it's not a good thing when elementary school teachers tell their students that they didn't like math, either. And yet I can think of more than a handful of those same people (grad students and professors) who would have no problem telling their calculus classes that they don't like calculus, or that it's not "real" math somehow... –  Jesse Madnick Jan 12 '13 at 9:48

I hear this pretty often from my freshman. It is one of the reasons why I allow my students to write extra credit papers about famous mathematicians, as a lot of inspiration comes from stories passed down. Maybe when a student reads about Conway, they will see the recreational side of mathematics, or I can use the story of Hypatia to inspire a nobler side of studying mathematics.

Even if a student makes it through Calculus, they have essentially been doing calculations and evaluations their entire mathematical career. A little history can go a long way in giving meaning behind the computations.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.