Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Dear all,

when reading a book of M. Berger, I learned that the injectivity radius Inj(x) on a compact Riemannian manifold depends continuously on the point x.

When the manifold is complete and non-compact, Inj may not be continuous. For example, Inj(x) decreases to zero when x moves to the most curved point on a paraboloid. However, it could be infinity at that point.

My question is, can we prove the continuity of Inj on a non-compact manifold under some conditions?

(I think that the weakest condition is to assume the finiteness of Inj.)

ps. I must admit that I don't know how to prove the continuity of Inj even on a compact manifold. I think that the argument should involve the stability of ODEs (the geodesic equation and Jacobi equation). If one of you have a reference about this, could you please tell me? thanks a lot!

share|improve this question
    
Are you sure about your paraboloid example? Take a look at Proposition 2.1.10 on Page 131 of W. Klingenberg's book Riemannian Geometry –  Willie Wong Jan 26 '11 at 19:01
    
You write: "Inj(x) decreases to zero when x moves to the most curved point on a paraboloid." this is not true, InjRad does not not go to zero... –  Anton Petrunin Jan 26 '11 at 19:03
    
In fact, on any compact region of a smooth Riemannian manifold, you have that the injectivity radius is bounded below by a strictly positive number... (see the same reference that I gave above) –  Willie Wong Jan 26 '11 at 19:16
    
Thank you a lot!! I should ask the question earlier, it had troubled me for one month... –  Chih-Wei Chen Jan 27 '11 at 16:19
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

The compactness is irrelevant; i.e if it is true for compact manifolds then the same is true for complete ones. (The same proof as in comact case works, but it is easier to do this way.)

If $R<\mathrm{InjRad}_p$ then one can construct a smooth metric on a sphere with an isometric copy of $B_R(p)$ inside.

If there is a sequence of points $x_n\to x$ such that $$\lim\ \mathrm{InjRad}_{x_n}< \mathrm{InjRad}_x,$$ apply above consruction for $R$ slightly smaller than $\mathrm{InjRad}_x$. You get a compact manifold with non-continuous InjRad.

If there is a sequence of points $x_n\to x$ such that $$\lim\ \mathrm{InjRad}_{x_n}> \mathrm{InjRad}_x$$ then apply above construction for $p=x_n$ for large enough $n$ and $R>\mathrm{InjRad}_x$. That leads to a contradiction again.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.