Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

So I have been mulling the following question over in my head for awhile now, and want to see if anyone else might have any ideas.
Begin with $M$ a manifold and suppose that $M$ has an antipodal map $\alpha:M\rightarrow M$, i.e. $\forall m\in M$ one has:

$\alpha(m)\neq m$
$\alpha(\alpha(m)) = m$

Let $A^n$ be the usual antipodal map on $S^n$: $A^n(s) = -s$. What I am wondering is if there is always an embedding $e:M\hookrightarrow S^n$ (for some $n$, not necessarily of minimal dimension), such that $e\circ\alpha = A^n|_{e(M)}$, that is that the antipodal map on the submanifold extends to the entire sphere.

One thing I suspect may be true is that when $M$ has more than one class of antipodal map, the necessary dimension of the sphere may depend on which class of maps I start with.

As an example, if I start with $M = \mathbb{T}^2$ with coordinates $(\theta,\phi)$, then I can easily define two classes of antipodal maps:

$\alpha_1(\theta,\phi) = (\theta+\pi,\phi)$
$\alpha_2(\theta,\phi) = (\theta+\pi,\phi+\pi)$

I have been able to convince myself with mental pictures that I can embed $\mathbb{T}^2$ into $S^3$ such that $\alpha_2$ coincides with $A^3$ (although I could even be mistaken about this), but I cannot convince myself that there is an embedding such that $\alpha_1$ coincides with $A^3$, so perhaps for this class of antipodal map, one must embed in a higher dimensional sphere.

Anyone have any insights or know of any results in this direction?

share|improve this question
1  
Your question is typically answered in a 1st course on Lie groups. Take a compact manifold $M$ with a compact Lie group action $G \times M \to M$. Then there exists an embedding of $M$ in some Euclidean space, and a representation of $G$ on that Euclidean space such that the inclusion $M \to \mathbb R^k$ is equivariant. So this reduces your question to the study of order $2$ elements of the orthogonal group. –  Ryan Budney Jan 26 '11 at 18:32
    
Oh, I'm stupid. –  Harry Gindi Jan 26 '11 at 18:37
1  
So I believe the answer to your question is yes. A linear involution of Euclidean space does not have to be an antipodal map but it fixes a subspace, and it's the antipodal map on the orthogonal subspace. This is enough to answer your question. –  Ryan Budney Jan 26 '11 at 18:41
1  
You don't have a fixed point on $M$, so the embedding misses the origin. $\mathbb R^n \setminus \{0\}$ is $O_n$-equivariantly isomorphic to a subspace of $S^n$. Consider a diffeomorphism $\mathbb R^n\setminus \{0\} \simeq S^{n-1} \times (0,\infty)$. –  Ryan Budney Jan 26 '11 at 19:07
2  
Couldn't one let $N$ be the orbit space of $\Bbb Z_2$ acting on $M$, then we can embed $N$ in some $\Bbb RP^j$. Lastly we can lift this to an embedding of double covers to get a smooth embedding of $M$ in $S^j$ which is equivariant. –  John Klein Jan 26 '11 at 20:31
show 5 more comments

1 Answer

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Let me elaborate on my comment above. Suppose $M$ is a manifold equipped with a smooth $\Bbb Z_2$ action that is also free. Then there is an equivariant smooth embedding $M \to S^j$, for some $j$, where we give the sphere the antipodal action. If we let $N$ be the orbit space of this action on $M$, then by Whithney's "easy" embedding theorem, we can embed $N$ smoothly in $\Bbb RP^j$, where $j = 2\dim M + 1$. Now pass to double covers To obtain an equivariant smooth embedding of $M$ in $S^j$.

This argument also works when $M$ is a manifold with free $S^1$-action, where we give the odd spheres the usual free action whose orbits give the complex projective spaces.

More generally, suppose $G$ is a finite group acting freely and smoothly on $M$. Suppose $V$ is a free orthogonal $G$-representation. Then the above can be generalized to show that there is an equivariant smooth embedding from $M$ into $S(jV)$ where the latter is the unit sphere of $j$-copies of $V$, $j$ large.

share|improve this answer
    
There must be something I am misunderstanding. I presume that the image of the embedding of $N$ will (or at least might) be contained in a ball in $\mathbb{R}P^j$. Given this, you get a map 2-1 from $M$ to $\mathbb{R}P^j$ which lifts to a map 2-1 to S^j$. Does this make sense? –  Alessandro Sisto Jan 26 '11 at 21:22
    
The embedding $N \to S^j$ lifts to a map of double covers by covering space theory. The map of double covers is automatically an embedding. –  John Klein Jan 26 '11 at 21:30
3  
You need to start by a map from $N\to \mathbb R P^\infty$ classifying the double cover $M\to N$. This factors through $\mathbb R P^j$ with $j = 2\dim M + 1$, can be perturbed to an embedding, and if $M$ is a non-trivial-cover, then the map $N\to \mathbb R P^j$ is non-trivial on fundamental groups, and so the image cannot be contained in a ball. –  Martin O Jan 26 '11 at 21:33
    
Thanks Martin, I thought that the starting point was a "random" embedding. –  Alessandro Sisto Jan 26 '11 at 21:40
    
Like Alessandro, I was worried about which double cover one would lift to, but I think Martin's comment about bringing in the classifying space of $Z/2Z$ cleared that up. –  ARupinski Jan 26 '11 at 21:47
show 1 more comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.