MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose for two given functions $f_1,f_2 \colon \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ there exist unique solutions $y_1$ and $y_2$ with the intersection of their intervals of existence $[0,\epsilon)$ to the integral equations $$y_k(x)=\int_{0}^{x} f_k(t,y_k(t)) dt$$. Moreover, suppose that $f_1(x,y)\leq f_2(x,y)$ (or strictly if that makes things easier), does it follow that $y_1 \leq y_2$ on $[0,\epsilon)$?

It's true if $f_1$ and $f_2$ are Lipschitz in $y$ and continuous in $x$ (i.e., satisfy the hypotheses of the standard uniqueness and existence theorem) or if $f_1$ and $f_2$ are decreasing in $y$ (i.e., satisfy the hypotheses of Peano's uniqueness theorem). The assumption of unique solutions is certainly necessary.

share|cite|improve this question
The functions $f_1$ and $f_2$ are assumed continuous, right? – Pietro Majer Jan 24 '11 at 16:31
That's one way to ensure existence of a solution, by Peano's existence theorem, but the proof of Peano's uniqueness does not require it. If both $f_k$ are continuous, then the solutions are classical solutions in that $y_k'(x)=f_k(x,y_k(x))$, and the problem becomes a matter of noticing that, $y_1(x)\leq y_2(x)$, on an interval $[0,\varepsilon)$, since $y_1'(0)\leq y_2'(0)$, and then you argue that the solutions can never cross such that $y_1(x)>y_2(x)$ after the crossing. – AppliedSide Jan 24 '11 at 17:52
(continued) For me the problem is interesting only if at least one of the $f_k$ is not continuous, and one only has that $y_k'=f_k(x,y_k)$ a.e. – AppliedSide Jan 24 '11 at 17:53
ah, I read your answer only after posting an answer. – Pietro Majer Jan 24 '11 at 18:16
up vote 1 down vote accepted

In general the answer seems to be no: Let $$ f_1(t,y)=\begin{cases} -1, &t\leq 0,\quad y\in \mathbb R\\\ 1,& t>0,\quad y>t/2,\\\ -1,& t>0,\quad -t/2 \leq y \leq t/2,\\\ -e^{-n^2y},& t\in [1/n,1/(n-1)),\quad y< -t/2,\quad n\geq 1, \end{cases} $$ and let $f_2(t,y)=-f_1(t,-y)$ so that $f_1(t,y)< f_2(t,y)$ when $(t,y)\in \mathbb R^2$.

For $x\geq 0$ we have the solutions $y_1(x)=x$ and $y_2(x)= -x$ and in order to show that e.g. $y_1$ is unique one must show that $y_1$ cannot be such that $-x/2 \leq y_1(x)\leq x/2$ some $x>0$ and furthermore show that if $-\infty < y_1(x)< -x/2$ when $1/n \leq x \leq 1/(n-1)$ for some $n>1$ then $$ 1 > e^{n^2y(1/(n-1))}-e^{n^2y(1/n)}= \frac n{n-1} > 1. $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.