Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Denote by $A$ the full ring of polynomials in one variable $t$ over the finite field with $q$ elements. For any monic polynomial $P \in A$ define $$ \sigma(P) = \sum_{d \mid P, d\, \text{monic}} d. $$ A monic polynomial $P \in A$ is called perfect if $$ P = \sigma(P). $$

Let $q=2.$ Two polynomials $P,Q \in A$ are called consecutive if $\deg(P)>0$ and ($Q=P+1$ or $P=Q+1$).

In AMM problem 10771 $[1999,166]$ proposed by Florian Luca and resolved by Francis B. Coghlan it is proved the inexistence of consecutive perfect numbers.

Question: Let $q=2.$ Are there consecutive polynomials $P,Q \in A$ such that $P$ and $Q$ are both perfect.

EDIT. Changed incorrect $A$ by correct $P$ in the definition as observed by Valerio.

share|improve this question
2  
Is there any particular reason you restrict to $q=2$? –  Thomas Bloom Jan 20 '11 at 12:56
    
I think that in the definition of $\sigma(P)$ you want $d$ to divide $P$ –  Valerio Talamanca Jan 20 '11 at 13:14
    
@Valerio: Of course !. I picked the definition from another post... –  Luis H Gallardo Jan 20 '11 at 14:33
    
@Thomas: The situation is already complicated enough for $q=2$ so... –  Luis H Gallardo Jan 20 '11 at 14:34

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

The answer is no. This follows from the following claims (which I will prove below):

1. If $P$ is perfect and $P(0)\ne 0$ or $P(1)\ne 0$ then $P$ is a square.

2. A perfect polynomial which is a square has no roots in $\mathbb{F}_2$.

Assume that $P$ and $P+1$ are both perfect. From Claim 1, either $P=Q^2$ is a square, or $P+1$ is a square. Consequently they are both squares (since $Q^2+1=(Q+1)^2$). From Claim 2 we get that $P$ and $P+1$ have no roots in $\mathbb{F}_2$, which is clearly absurd.

Proof of Claim 1. Let $P=P_1^{a_1}\ldots P_n^{a_n}$ be the prime decomposition of $P$ and assume that $P(0)=1$. Then $P_i(0)=1$. Since $P$ is perfect one has $$(*)\qquad\qquad P=\prod_{i=1}^n(1+P_i+\ldots + P_i^{a_i}),$$ so $1=P(0)=\prod_{i=1}^n(1+a_i)$, proving that $a_i$ are all even. If $P(1)=1$, apply the previous argument to $P(X+1)$.

Proof of Claim 2. The hypothesis implies that (*) holds and all $a_i$ are even. Then $1+P_i(0)+\ldots + P_i^{a_i}(0)=1$ for all $i$, so $P(0)=1$. The proof that $P(1)=1$ is similar.

share|improve this answer
    
@Andrei: It is also a perfect solution ! –  Luis H Gallardo Jan 20 '11 at 15:47
    
Thank you, I enjoyed this problem! –  Andrei Moroianu Jan 20 '11 at 22:08

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.