6
$\begingroup$

If I am not mistaken there is a theorem that says any curve $C$ can be embedded in $\mathbf{P}^3$. What can be said about surfaces? Do we have a theorem like:

All surfaces can be embedded in $\mathbf{P}^{N}$ for some fixed $N$.

And if not what is the simplest counterexample? A counterexample would be an infinite sequence of surfaces: $\{S_1, S_2, \cdots \}$ and infinite sequence of strictly increasing positive integers: $\{n_1, n_2, \cdots \}$ such that $S_i$ can not be embedded in $\mathbf{P}^{n_i}$.

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

18
$\begingroup$

All smooth projective surfaces can be embedded in $\mathbb{P}^5$ using a (linear) projection. This is a classical theorem in algebraic geometry. In general, it is known that any smooth projective variety of dimension $n$ can be embedded into $\mathbb{P}^{2n+1}$.

The proof runs as follows: The secant variety $Sec(X)$ (the closure of points on secants on $X$) and the tangent variety $Tan(X)$ (the closure of the union of tangent spaces) both have dimension $\le 2n+1$, so if $X$ lies in a big projective space $\mathbb{P}^N$, successive projections from points outside $Sec(X)\cup Tan(X)$, gives you a morphism $\mathbb{P}^{2n+1}$ which is injective, finite, unramified hence a closed embedding.

This result makes surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^4$ an interesting study. A remarkable theorem of Ellingsrud-Peskine says that surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^4$ are very special: those not of general type belong to finitely many families, hence one has some hope of classifying them all. For example, Hartshorne conjectured that the degree of rational surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^4$ is bounded (it is now belived that this bound is equal to 12).

There are however non-projective surfaces, which cannot be embedded in any projective space, see e.g., this question.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Nonprojective surfaces are singular. If you allow singularities, there is no bound on the embedding dimension, even for projective surfaces (or one-point schemes, for that matter). $\endgroup$ Jan 20, 2011 at 15:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Nonprojective surfaces are singular". Why? A non-algebraic complex torus is certainly smooth as a complex Kaehler manifold. Probably you meant "non-projective, proper algebraic" or something like this. $\endgroup$ Jan 20, 2011 at 16:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Francesco: Indeed, I was assuming from the start that we were talking about proper algebraic surfaces. Smooth proper algebraic surfaces are known to be projective; together with compactification and resolution of singularities, this implies that smooth algebraic surfaces are quasiprojective. $\endgroup$ Jan 20, 2011 at 16:40
1
$\begingroup$

The explanation above can be expanded with the following classical fact. Consider the Veronese surface $V$ in $\mathbb{P}^{5}$ which is the image of $\mathbb{P}^{2}$ via the embedding induced by $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(2)$. Note that $\mathbb{P}^{5}$ parametrizes conics and $V$ parametrizes conics of rank $1$ i.e. squares of linear forms. Since the general conic can not be written as sum of two squares the variety of secant lines $Sec(V)$ has dimension $4$ instead of the expected dimension $5$. So $Sec(V)$ is a cubic hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}^{5}$ singular along $V$. This means that if $p\in \mathbb{P}^{5}$ is a general point the projection

$$\pi_{p}:V\rightarrow \mathbb{P}^{4}$$

defines an isomorphism between $V$ and a smooth surface of degree $4$ in $\mathbb{P}^{4}$. Indeed Severi proved that the Veronese surface $V$ is the only surface in $\mathbb{P}^{5}$ which can be isomorphically projected in $\mathbb{P}^{4}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.