MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be an Enriques surface. A $(-2)$-curve is an irriducible rational curve on X such that $C^2 = -2$. By Proposition [VIII,16.1] from Barth-Peters-Van de Ven, we have that if $D^2 = -2$, then it is a $(-2)$-curve, but do such curves exist?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 13 down vote accepted

As explained in J.C. Ottem's answer, the generic Enriques surface contains no smooth rational curves at all.

However, it can happen that some special Enriques surface $X$ contains $(-2)$-curves, and also infinitely many of them (see this paper by Cossec and Dolgachev). The maximal number of disjoint $(-2)$ curves on $X$ is eight, and Enriques surfaces with eight disjoint $(-2)$-curves are classified in the article

Mendes Lopes, Margarida; Pardini, Rita

Enriques surfaces with eight nodes

Math. Z. 241 (2002), no. 4, 673–683.

The authors first show that, setting $C_1, \dots,C_8$ to be the exceptional $(-2)$-curves of $X$, the divisor $C_1+\dots+C_8$ is divisible by $2$ in the Picard group of $X$, or equivalently there exists a double cover $\widetilde{X} \to X$ branched exactly over them.

The main theorem then states that an Enriques surface with eight disjoint $(-2)$-curves is isomorphic to $X=D_1\times D_2/G$, where $D_1,D_2$ are elliptic curves and $G$ is either $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$ or $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Enriques surfaces always have Picard rank equal to 10, as follows from the Lefschetz (1,1) theorem. However, the effective cone is not constant in moduli which is what allows the number of (-2)-curves to vary. – ulrich Jan 18 '11 at 12:16
Yes, you are right. I added an answer below explaining this. – J.C. Ottem Jan 18 '11 at 12:20
You are definitely right. I corrected the answer, thank you – Francesco Polizzi Jan 18 '11 at 13:13

It is well-known that (at least over $k=\mathbb{C}$) that the generic Enriques surface does not contain any smooth rational curves at all. This can be seen, for example, using the global Torelli theorem for Enriques surfaces. For a complete proof, see

Barth, W., Peters, C.: Automorphisms of Enriques surfaces. Invent. Math. 73, 383-411 (1983).

However, as Fransesco's answer shows, there are Enriques surfaces containing rational curves. Moreover, it is also known that once $S$ contains a rational curve, then generically it contains infinitely many. The reason for this is basically since the automorphism groups of Enriques surfaces tend to be very large.

In fact, Cossec and Dolgatchev proved the following surprising result about rational curves on an Enriques surface:

Let $S$ be an Enriques surface of degree $d$ in a projective space $\mathbb{P}^n$. Assume that S contains a smooth rational curve, then it contains such a curve of degree less or equal to $d$.

This implies for example that the subset of the Hilbert scheme parametrizing Enriques surfaces of degree $d$ in $\mathbb{P}^n$ containing smooth rational curves is a constructible subset.

share|cite|improve this answer
I think that the correct statement is: "once $X$ contains a smooth rational curve, then $generically$ it contains infinitely many of them". In fact, the general nodal Enriques surface has a big automorphism group, but some special Enriques surfaces have finite automorphism group (examples were given by Dolgachev, and are contained in the paper of Barth and Peters that you cited). – Francesco Polizzi Jan 18 '11 at 13:23
Good point, fixed. – J.C. Ottem Jan 18 '11 at 13:38

Since an Enriques surface is elliptic, it may have (-2)-curves as a component of singular fibers. You may refer S. Kondo, Enriques surfaces with finite automorphism groups. Japan. J. Math.(N.S.) 12 (1986), no. 2, 191--282. In the paper Kondo constructed explicitly many examples of Enriques surfaces with finitely many (-2)-curves.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.