Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Chern-Weil theory gives characteristic classes (e.g. Chern class, Euler class, Pontryagin) of a vector bundle in terms of polynomials in the curvature form of an arbitrary connection. There seems to be no hope in getting Stiefel-Whitney classes from this method since Chern-Weil gives cohomology classes with real coefficients while Stiefel-Whitney classes have $\mathbb Z/2$ coefficients. Further, since any vector bundle over a curve has vanishing curvature, classes obtained by Chern-Weil can't distinguish, for example, the Mobius bundle from the trivial bundle over the circle (while Stiefel-Whitney classes do).

Nonetheless, I am wondering if there is a more general or abstract framework that allows one to define the Stiefel-Whitney classes in the spirit of Chern-Weil. For example, maybe this is done through a more abstract definition of a connection/curvature.

share|improve this question
Might be worth looking nLabwards, e.g., ncatlab.org/nlab/show/… or ncatlab.org/nlab/show/… or math.ntnu.no/~stacey/Mathforge/nForum/… . –  David Corfield Jan 18 '11 at 17:06
I don't have an answer to this question, but I have a guess. In general, if you want to use De Rham theory to recover integral invariants of a manifold, a smart thing to do is look at distributional differential forms (I first learned of the literature on this from MO, but I can't remember where). So I would start by defining a distributional connection on a vector bundle $E$ (rather, on its frame bundle) to be a distributional $E$-valued 1-form and going from there. –  Paul Siegel Jan 18 '11 at 18:52
You might want to take a look at "Stiefel-Whitney currents" by Harvey and Zweck [MR1731064 (2001c:53104)]. –  680 Jan 19 '11 at 12:07
@David and 680: thanks for the links! –  Eric O. Korman Jan 20 '11 at 23:37
@diverietti: I think the confusion is about real curves as opposed to complex curves ;-) –  Tobias Hartnick Apr 11 '11 at 14:41
show 4 more comments

1 Answer

I want to say the short answer is no.

But in certain contexts, we can get things that are analogous. For example if you take a principal $B$-bundle $Q$ over $M$ and then suppose you can have a "nice" :) central extension of your lie group $B$ by $$1 \to \underline{\mathbb{C}^*}_M \to \tilde{B} \to B \to 1,$$where $\underline{\mathbb{C}^*}_M$ is the sheaf of smooth functions into $\mathbb{C}^*$, then you can define a cohomology class in $H^1(M, \underline{B})$ by seeing how well you can lift your bundle to a $\tilde{B}$-bundle. Now by the central extension, we would have $$H^1(M, \underline{B}) \overset{\sim}{=} H^2(M , \underline{\mathbb{C}^*}_M)$$ and then by the exponential sequence you would have $$H^1(M, \underline{B}) \overset{\sim}{=} H^2(M , \underline{\mathbb{C}^*}_M) \overset{\sim}{=} H^3(M, \mathbb{Z}).$$

And so what I am saying (since principal bundles have associated vector bundles) that your vector bundle in the right conditions could give you a degree three cohomology class in the integers. I'm sure you could pluck your Z/2 coefficients out of this (I don't know why you would want to be so rigid, nor am I claiming you are asking for that). Then there is an actual geometric interpretation of this integer related to a certain curvature form in this construction that I am not quite ready to add to this answer yet :)

share|improve this answer
By the way, I'm fairly certain that Weil developed some of these methods. –  cheyne Feb 26 '13 at 15:42
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.