Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $G$ be some (dimension $1$, to simplify) formal group over a characteristic $0$ field $K$. The law of $G$ is denoted by $\oplus$. If $w(X) \in K[[X]] dX$ is a differential form, let $F_w(X)$ be the unique power series such that $dF_w=w$ and $F_w(0)=0$. Let $F_w^2(X,Y) = F_w(X \oplus Y) - F_w(X) - F_w(Y)$. Say that $w$ is second kind if $F_w^2$ has bounded coefficients and that $F_w$ is exact if $F_w$ has bounded coefficients. The 1st de Rham cohomology group of $G$ is defined by $$H^1_{dR}(G)= \text{\{second kind forms\}} / \text{\{exact forms\}}.$$

Theorem: the group $H^1_{dR}(G)$ has dimension $h$, the height of $G$.

Question: where can I find a proof of this?

The above definitions and theorem are in pages 633-634 of Colmez' "Periodes $p$-adiques des varietes abeliennes" for example, and he refers to Fontaine's book "Groupes $p$-divisibles sur les corps locaux", but without giving a precise reference. Iovita also uses these definitions in "Formal sections and de Rham cohomology of semistable abelian varieties" and refers to chapter V of Katz' "Crystalline cohomology, Dieudonne modules and Jacobi sums". In either case, I can't say that the references have been very helpful.

share|improve this question
1  
If you like, I could send you a manuscript that is under construction that includes a proof of this. –  Neil Strickland Jan 17 '11 at 18:13
1  
Is $K$ a local (hence $p$-adic) field? –  fherzig Jan 17 '11 at 18:46
    
@Neil: that would be great, thank you! –  Laurent Berger Jan 17 '11 at 18:48
1  
@Florian: yes absolutely, I forgot to mention that. $K$ should be a finite extension of $Q_p$ –  Laurent Berger Jan 17 '11 at 18:49
1  
Neil, I am interested in a proof too, is that too much work to post the proof here or secret or is it possible for you to share it ? Thanks by advance. –  A M Jan 17 '11 at 19:48
show 2 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 17 down vote accepted

I have put an updated copy of my formal groups notes here:

http://neil-strickland.staff.shef.ac.uk/courses/formalgroups/fg.pdf

They are not really finished, but the relevant material is discussed in Section 18.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.