0

I am reading Local fields and see Serre using $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(\mathfrak{a})$ where $\mathfrak{a}$ is a fractional ideal of the Dedekind domain $A$ and $v_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is the valuation associated to the discrete valuation ring $A_{\mathfrak{p}}$. Serre did not really define this in the book, I looked it up on the web and found the following definition: since $\mathfrak{a}$ is a fractional ideal, there exists $d\in A$ such that $d\mathfrak{a}\subset A$. Define $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(\mathfrak{a})$ as $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d\mathfrak{a}) - v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d)$ where $v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d\mathfrak{a})$ is defined to be the power $k$ that gives $d\mathfrak{a}A_{\mathfrak{p}} = (\mathfrak{p}A_{\mathfrak{p}})^{k}$. This work fine in proving the theorems following this idea in Serre's book. However, I could not prove that this is well-defined since $d$ is certainly not unique. Clarification is appreciated. Thanks.

flag

2 Answers

3

Let $d'$ be any other nonzero element of $R$ such that $d' \mathfrak{a} \subset R$. Then

$v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d' \mathfrak{a}) + v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d) = v_{\mathfrak{p}}(dd' \mathfrak{a}) = v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d') + v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d\mathfrak{a})$.

So

$v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d'\mathfrak{a}) - v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d') = v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d \mathfrak{a}) - v_{\mathfrak{p}}(d)$.

(In general, Serre's Local Fields routinely leaves computations like this to the reader, so you should probably get practice working them out for yourself now, before the material becomes more difficult.)

link|flag
2

Fractional ideals in Dedekind domains have unique factorization into (positive or negative) powers of prime ideals. To find $v_p(a)$, see what power of $p$ occurs in the factorization of $a$.

Now check that the strange definition of valuation you got off the web is equivalent to this definition (and thus independent of $d$).

link|flag

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.