Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $E$ be a supersingular elliptic curve over a finite field of characteristic $p$, and $\mathbb{F}_q\supset \mathbb{F}_{p^2}$ be a finite field large enough such that all (absolute) endomorphisms of $E$ is defined over $\mathbb{F}_q$. We write $G$ for the absolute Galois group of $\mathbb{F}_q$. It is well known that the Frobenius automorphism $\varphi$ is a (topological) generator of $G$. Let us fix a prime $\ell\neq p$. By the Tate Conjecture, $$\mathrm{End}(E)\otimes\mathbb{Q}_\ell=\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}(V_\ell(E))^G=\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}(V_\ell(E))^\varphi. $$

Since $E$ is supersingular, $\mathrm{End}(E)$ is an order in a quaternion algebra. In particular, $\mathrm{rank}_\mathbb{Z}(\mathrm{End}(E))=4$. So $$ \mathrm{End}(E)\otimes\mathbb{Q}_\ell=\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}(V_\ell(E))$$ It follows that $\varphi$ is in the center of $\mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{Q}_\ell}(V_\ell(E))$. In other words, $\varphi$ is a scalar. This clearly leads to a contradiction (say, with the Riemann Hypothesis). Where did the argument go wrong?

share|improve this question
This question is a fabulous instance of the phenomenon that surely many people have observed, many times over: the mistake in the argument is at the unique point where the author writes the word "clearly". –  Kevin Buzzard Jan 14 '11 at 11:58
I think it's a well-known entry in the mathematical thesaurus that "clearly" is a synonym for "I should probably check that." –  JSE Jan 14 '11 at 14:24
Let $E/\mathbb F_p$ be an elliptic curve, with $p\ge5.$ Then $E$ is super-singular if and only if the Frob. trace $a_p$ on the Tate module is 0 (see Silverman I, an exercise in the finite field chapter). If $\alpha,\bar{\alpha}$ are the Frob. eigenvalues, then $\alpha+\bar{\alpha}=a_p=0\Rightarrow\alpha$ is purely imaginary. Hence the Frob. eigenvalues of $E\otimes\mathbb F_{p^2}$ are equal and are real (as Emerton pointed out in his answer). I learned this from B. Poonen. –  shenghao May 20 '11 at 12:24

1 Answer 1

There is nothing wrong. A typical case will be $\mathbb F_q = \mathbb F_{p^2}$ and $\varphi = -p$. Since $q^{1/2} = (p^2)^{1/2} = p$, this is consistent with RH.

share|improve this answer
Thank you. For some reason I always thought for the elliptic curves, the eigenvalues of the Frobenius is in $\mathbb{C}-\mathbb{R}$. I guess this is an instance where it is not. –  Jiangwei Xue Jan 14 '11 at 11:37
Jiangwei, I recommend to you in the strongest terms that you spend a few days doing explicit computations with the chord-and-tangent algorithm for adding points on an elliptic curve. A specific supersingular curve, and a specific $p$. And then a specific ordinary one over the same base. –  Lubin Jan 14 '11 at 19:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.