If $\mathcal{C}$ is a category, then surely the category of simplicial objects $s\mathcal{C}$ is not automatically a model category. What conditions must $\mathcal{C}$ satisfy in order for $s\mathcal{C}$ to have a reasonable model structure?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
3
1
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
It always has a model structure using Kan's theory of Reedy categories. For a proof, see Hirschhorn Model Categories and their Localizations 15.3. This is because $\Delta$ and $\Delta^{op}$ are both Reedy categories. I will address the more general question as well: If $C$ is any small category, the condition for $M^C$ to be a model category is that $M$ be cofibrantly generated. However, it is not necessarily true that $M^C$ is itself cofibrantly generated. In general, the condition we need for that is called combinatoriality. However, the existence of such a cofibrantly generated model structure that is not combinatorial would disprove Vopenka's principle (a large cardinal axiom), so I cannot give an example of one. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
7
|
Quillen gives a couple of sets of sufficient conditions for $s\mathcal{C}$ to be a model category, in his Homotopical Algebra book. Notably, this includes the case when $\mathcal{C}$ is a complete and cocomplete category with a small set of projective generators. This gives model structures for categories of simplicial groups, simplicial rings, simplicial lie algebras, etc. |
||||||||
|

