28

16

This is actually not a question of mine, so I'll be short on motivation and say nothing beyond that if this were true, a few fancy harmonic analysis techniques that a colleague of mine used in proving his recent results could be replaced by the mean value theorem.

Suppose that $A_1,\dots,A_n$ and $B_1,\dots,B_n$ are two commuting families of self-adjoint operators in a Hilbert space $H$ (that is all $A$'s commute, all $B$'s commute, but $A$'s may not commute with $B$'s). Assume that $\|A_k-B_k\|\le 1$ for all $k$. Is it true that there exists a one-parameter family $C_k(t)$ of self-adjoint commuting (for each fixed $t$) operators such that $C_k(0)=A_k$, $C_k(1)=B_k$ and $\int_0^1\left\|\frac d{dt}C_k(t)\right\|dt\le M(n)$ where $M(n)$ is a constant depending on $n$ only? In other words, is the set of commuting $n$-tuples of self-adjoint operators a "chord-arc set"?

flag
3 
@fedja: is your question clear for n=1? if A1 and B1 are orthogonal projections of different ranks, why do we have C1? maybe you mean $||A_k-B_k||<\epsilon<1$? – Kate Juschenko Jan 6 2011 at 22:11
3 
Is this known when $H$ is finite dimensional? – Andrey Rekalo Jan 6 2011 at 22:46
3 
@Andrey: I assume that in finite dimension you just take the orthonormal frame of eigenvectors of all $A$s and connect them by a geodesic (in the orthogonal/unitary group) to the orthogonal frame of eigenvectors of the $B$s. I did not do the computation, I confess, but it seems reasonably clear that the conditions are satisfied. This seems less obvious in the infinite dimensional case. – Igor Rivin Jan 6 2011 at 23:46
3 
@Igor: But then the length of the path can be as large as the diameter $d_m$ of $SU_m$, $m$ the dimension of $H$. If the answer to the question is yes, we must have $d_m\le M(n)$, and therefore $\sup_md(m)<\infty$. Is this true ? – Denis Serre Jan 7 2011 at 7:28
7 
@Martin: $C_k(t)$ should commute for each t. It seems that if norms of $A_k$ and $B_k$ are bounded then the statement is true, just taking homotopy of $A_k$ to $0$ and then $0$ to $B_k$, i.e $C_k(t)=(1-2t) A_k$ if $t\in [0,1/2]$ and $C_k(t)=(2t-1)B_k$ if $t\in[1/2,1]$ – Kate Juschenko 2 mins ago – Kate Juschenko Jan 8 2011 at 17:06
show 8 more comments

1 Answer

-2

Here is a "scratch of a proof". It might be completely wrong since I though about it in 1am.

  1. We can attach to the family $A_i$ protectors $P_\lambda$ where $\lambda \in \mathbb R^n$.

  2. For $J=(j_1,...,j_n)\in \mathbb Z^n$ Let $V_J=Im P_J \cap \bigcap Ker P_{j_1,..., j_i-1,...j_n}$.

  3. We have an $A_i$ invariant decomposition $V=\bigoplus V_J$ and $||(A_i-j_i)|_{V_J}|| \leq 1$.

  4. we can assume that $(A_i)|_{V_J}=j_i$ (by connecting it by strait line).

  5. We do the same for $B_i$.

  6. Now the problem should be similar to the f.d. case. This step I did not think through, but I hope it will be OK.

Good luck

link|flag
Could you elaborate 6? Already having a proof in finite dimension with constant $M(n)$ not depending on the dimension does not seem clear to me. – Mikael de la Salle Jan 11 at 12:23

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.