0
$\begingroup$

In a letter to Dirichlet, Gottold Eisenstein stated the congruence: $$ q(u) \equiv u - \frac{u^2}{2}+ \frac{u^3}{3} - \frac{u^4}{4} + \cdots + \frac{u^{p-2}}{p-2}-\frac{u^{p-1}}{p-1} \pmod{p} $$ where $p$ in an odd prime number and $$ q(u) = \frac{(1+u)^p -1 - u^p}{p}. $$ Putting $u=1$ and using $$ 1+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{3}+ \cdots + \frac{1}{p-2}+\frac{1}{p-1} \equiv 0 \pmod{p} $$ we get $$ 1+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{5}+ \cdots + \frac{1}{p-4}+\frac{1}{x} \equiv \frac{q(1)}{2} \pmod{p} $$ for $x=p-2.$

Question: There is a $t\quad \quad$ ``odd" solution of the following congruence: $$ 1+\frac{1}{3}+\frac{1}{5}+ \cdots + \frac{1}{p-4}+ \cdots + \frac{1}{t} \equiv q(1) \pmod{p} $$ i.e.,

$$ t \in \{p-2,p+2,p+4, \ldots\}. $$

I just got $-2$ points on this post but I do not see why ? There not seem to exists negative votes ???

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, such a $t$ exists provided $q(1)+\frac1{p-3}\not \equiv 0 (mod p)$ by the previous identity. Do you want $t$ as a function of $p$? $\endgroup$
    – J.C. Ottem
    Jan 6, 2011 at 19:15
  • $\begingroup$ @J.C.: thanks for comment. From the comment I detected a technical error in the formula. Hope new edit is OK and clearer. $\endgroup$ Jan 6, 2011 at 21:38
  • $\begingroup$ It's still unclear. As far as I remember, the sum of reciprocals of odds $<p$ is treated in my joint paper arxiv.org/abs/1004.4337 (one of the lemmas). $\endgroup$ Jan 6, 2011 at 22:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 17 doesn't have a solution. $\endgroup$ Jan 6, 2011 at 22:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Wadim: Nice, thanks, you think to page 4, formula (21) of your paper ?. There are also very nice formulas for the fermat quotient , etc in an old paper of Emma Lemmer in Annals of Math 339, 2, 350--360, (1938). $\endgroup$ Jan 6, 2011 at 22:27

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.