MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose we pick $m$ vectors i.i.d from the surface of a $d$-dimensional unit sphere (they all have length 1). What would be the expected length of their sum?

Equivalently, we can ask about the expected length of their average.

I managed to solve it for 2 vectors in 2 dimensions, but I need a generic solution...

If there's any "known solution" for this problem, even a link will be good enough.

share|cite|improve this question
Hint: use linearity of expectation. – Igor Rivin Jan 4 '11 at 0:56
Do you need an exact answer, or just an approximation? If $d$ is large then you could try approximating the vectors by rescaled Gaussian vectors; the sum of the vectors will itself be a Gaussian vector, and the length will be the square root of a rescaled chi-squared r.v. – Yemon Choi Jan 4 '11 at 0:58
I need an exact answer – Oren Jan 4 '11 at 0:59
@Igor I'm not seeing how to use your hint. Have you actually thought through a complete solution? I see that this gives me an easy way to compute E(length^2), but this doesn't tell me what E(length) is. – David Speyer Jan 4 '11 at 1:03
This isn't very closely related, but I can't resist mentioning the amazing fact that the probability that this length is $<1$ in 2 dimensions is $1/(m+1)$. This might mean there's some hope of a not-too-ugly formula in 2 dimensions. – Peter Shor Jan 4 '11 at 17:52

OK, to atone for my rash comment, I recalled that I needed something related in:

@article {MR2356429, AUTHOR = {Rivin, Igor}, TITLE = {Surface area and other measures of ellipsoids}, JOURNAL = {Adv. in Appl. Math.}, FJOURNAL = {Advances in Applied Mathematics}, VOLUME = {39}, YEAR = {2007}, NUMBER = {4}, PAGES = {409--427}, ISSN = {0196-8858}, MRCLASS = {52A38 (28A75 33C65 60F99)}, MRNUMBER = {2356429 (2008k:52012)}, DOI = {10.1016/j.aam.2006.08.009}, URL = {}, }

(see page 414). And found it in the book by Mathai and Provost:

@book {MR1192786, AUTHOR = {Mathai, A. M. and Provost, Serge B.}, TITLE = {Quadratic forms in random variables}, SERIES = {Statistics: Textbooks and Monographs}, VOLUME = {126}, NOTE = {Theory and applications}, PUBLISHER = {Marcel Dekker Inc.}, ADDRESS = {New York}, YEAR = {1992}, PAGES = {xxii+367}, ISBN = {0-8247-8691-2}, MRCLASS = {62H10 (62E15)}, MRNUMBER = {1192786 (94g:62110)}, MRREVIEWER = {Donald R. Jensen}, }

It should be in the vicinity of page 62. The argument uses Laplace transforms, and is not trivial.

share|cite|improve this answer
Any chance you want to provide a brief explanation for why your comment was rash? It of course seemed reasonable to someone as naive as me. – Deane Yang Jan 4 '11 at 3:16
As @David Speyer pointed out, I was computing the expectation of the SQUARE of the length (which equals $m$, btw), but this does not tell you what the expectation of the length is... – Igor Rivin Jan 4 '11 at 3:22

At Jonathan Borwein and co-authors discuss $$\int_{[0,1]^n}\left|\sum_{k=1}^ne^{2\pi ix_k}\right|^s\thinspace dx$$ which you may find has some relevance to your question. That paper also has references to others where such integrals are discussed, and there's another paper on Jonathan's website on a closely related topic.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.