MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).

## Unpopular “elementary” theorems/identities to impress an audience of mathematicians. [closed]

This question grew out of my recent job interview. Since the interviewers were math professors, I had a hard time searching for interesting elementary theorems in case I got asked for one. I thought topics such as the Banach-Tarski paradox, Godel's theorems, the Mandelbrot set, the Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem, etc were well-known and wouldn't do the job. However, after a cursory search, I found some to my taste:

1.Marden's theorem (or here)(It is not Marsden.) Gaussâ€“Lucas theorem

2.The identity $\int_{0}^1 \frac{x^4(1-x)^4}{1+ x^4} dx = \frac{22}{7}- \pi$

So, my question here is an invitation to expand the list (of theorems that would get an interviewee accepted).

To recap, my criteria for selection are

1. Not widely known,
2. Elementary- understandable to a first year grad student, and
3. Interesting-i.e. MOtizens, assuming they are the audience, will be delighted to have come across it.

Thank you.

-
Why did you expect to be asked to state interesting elementary theorems at your job interview? It's not like a thesis defense. You tell them what you know, not what they would like you to know. – Spiro Karigiannis Jan 3 2011 at 13:44
I am a student there and the faculty wanted to recruit tutors for freshmen/sophomores. But their selection criteria was not only ability to do the tutoring but they also wanted to know whether the applicant wants to continue a career in Mathematics, how he can entice/encourage his juniors to go on studying Math, what Math field he delights in, etc. – To be cont'd Jan 3 2011 at 13:57
Even granting the somewhat strange motivation of this question: isn't it self-defeating? Whatever gets posted here will become much more widely known. Moreover, I find it somehow dishonest to get examples of one's mathematical knowledge and enthusiasm from others on the internet. I am voting to close. – Pete L. Clark Jan 3 2011 at 14:08
I agree with Pete but could not find a good way to say it. It seems to me that in light of your interview you should be trying to figure out how to become a better candidate rather than finding ways to trick the hiring committee, or whatever, into thinking you are a better candidate than you are? – Qiaochu Yuan Jan 3 2011 at 14:25
+1 simply for pointing out Marden's theorem. – Mitch Harris Jan 3 2011 at 16:58

## closed as off topic by Pete L. Clark, Qiaochu Yuan, Mariano SuĂˇrez-Alvarez, Andrew Stacey, Andy PutmanJan 3 2011 at 15:21

For a function $f=f(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n):\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R$ let $Pf(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)$ denote the sum of $f$ over the $n!$ quantities that result from all possible $n!$ permutations of the $x_i$. Then $$\frac{x_1^n+x_2^n+\dots+x_n^n}{n}-x_1x_2\dots x_n=\frac{1}{2\ n!}(\phi_1+\phi_2+ \dots \phi_n),$$ where $$\phi_k=P[(x_1^{n-k}-x_2^{n-k})(x_1-x_2)x_3x_4\dots x_{k+1}]$$ $$=P[(x_1-x_2)^2(x_1^{n-k-1}+\dots x_2^{n-k-1})x_3x_4\dots x_{k+1}]\geq0.$$ The proof dates back to Hurwitz.
Amazing. Thanks. I am checking for $n= 2, 3,\ldots$. – To be cont'd Jan 3 2011 at 14:33