MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Physicists computing multiloop Feynman diagrams have introduced various techniques and conjectures that involve the notion of Degree of Transcendentality (DoT). From what I understand one defines

1) $DoT(r)=0$, r rational

2) $DoT(\pi^k)=k$, $k \in {\mathbb N}$,

3) $DoT(\zeta(k))=k$,

4) $DoT( a \cdot b)= DoT(a)+DoT(b)$

One then proves for example that the $\ell$-loop contribution to a certain scaling function in $N=4$ Supersymmetric gauge theory consists of a sum of terms all of which have DoT equal to $2 \ell-2$.

This can't be rigorous mathematically, since it is not even known that $\zeta(2n+1)$ is transcendental, but is there some circle of ideas, or conjecture in mathematics that if true would give a precise definition to DoT?

share|cite|improve this question
Not only that, but in what way is $\pi^k$ any more transcendental than $\pi?,$ given that it appears to be contained in $\mathbb{Z}[\pi]...$ – Igor Rivin Dec 27 '10 at 3:57
Transcendentality ? I would have said transcendence. – Chandan Singh Dalawat Dec 27 '10 at 4:01
You might be looking for some weight-like invariant of (periods of) motives, or of mixed Tate motives. For instance, the motive $\mathbb{Q}(-k)$ has period $\pi^k$ (up to algebraic multiples), and the weight of $\mathbb{Q}(-k)$ is $2k$. The paper "Motives associated to sums of graphs" by Spencer Bloch might point you in the right direction. (NB I've never read it.) For an introduction to periods, see the paper "Periods" by Kontsevich and Zagier. – JBorger Dec 27 '10 at 4:56
The book "Feynman motives" by Matilde Marcolli might be useful as well. – José Figueroa-O'Farrill Dec 27 '10 at 6:54
Just to be clear, I did not invent the terminology and I have never been a disciple of the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. – Jeff Harvey Dec 27 '10 at 13:40
up vote 9 down vote accepted

Your transcendentality reminds me about the Institute of Algebraic Meditation at Höör (Sweden). To be honest, your definition corresponds to what is known as the weight of a (multiple) zeta value (see Michael Hoffman's, especially the references on MZVs). These indeed occur in the computation of Feynman's diagrams. As for conjectures related to the transcendental number theory tag, a belief is that $\pi$ and odd zeta values $\zeta(3)$, $\zeta(5)$, etc, are algebraically independent over the rationals.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.