Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm no expert in this field, but I am familiar with the classification of rotationally symmetric surfaces with constant mean curvature by Delaunay. I am aware that once we drop embeddedness and smoothness, the situation becomes very complicated.

My question is, other than the family of surfaces from Delaunay, is there a classification of (embedded in a Riemannain manifold $M^n$, smooth) surfaces with constant mean curvature? If not, is there a classification known under additional conditions? $M^n = R^n$, closed surfaces, surfaces with boundary, finite total curvature, etc?

I write such a broad question as I find this topic quite interesting and beautiful, and hope that others also share this feeling.

share|improve this question
3  
There's a remarkable correspondence between cmc surfaces in $R^3$ and minimal surfaces in $S^3$, due to Lawson. However, it only holds locally (or for simply-connected immersed surfaces), so usually doesn't give much information on embedded CMC surfaces in $R^3$, even though many embedded minimal surfaces in $S^3$ are known. ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=270280 –  Ian Agol Dec 25 '10 at 0:08
    
This is interesting also, thank you. –  Glen Wheeler Dec 25 '10 at 9:48
add comment

4 Answers 4

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Karsten Grosse-Brauckmann, Rob Kusner, and John Sullivan have written on the classification of embedded CMC surfaces for quite some time. I think a reasonable place to read about this program is this survey by Rob Kusner. You might also want to look at some of their other papers on the arxiv as well.

A nice idea used in their work which goes back to a paper of Korevaar, Kusner and Solomon in the 80's is that embdedded CMC surfaces have "ends" which asymptote to Delaunay surfaces - furthermore these ends can be assigned a "tension" (this should be familiar to you as the parameter which distinguishes between Delaunay surfaces) and these tensions satisfy a force balance rule.

I think the story for minimal surfaces is much better understood due to the work of Meeks and Minicozzi though I haven't read their work in much detail.

share|improve this answer
    
the version of the survey on Kusner's webpage is slightly newer gang.umass.edu/~kusner/other/msri-final-revised.ps –  j.c. Dec 25 '10 at 1:47
    
Thanks, this is very helpful. –  Glen Wheeler Dec 25 '10 at 9:44
add comment

You might also look at the work of Katsuei Kenmotsu. His paper "Surfaces of revolution with prescribed mean curvature." (1980) generalizes the results of Delaunay to non-constant mean curvature functions. Meanwhile, the book "Surfaces With Constant Mean Curvature" http://books.google.com/books/about/Surfaces_with_constant_mean_curvature.html?id=xlgb69LsBOsC investigates CMC surfaces in more general setting, and includes quite a few graphics and examples to titillate your senses :) (I agree with you that the subject is quite beautiful). Though I believe that most, if not all, of his investigations have been in the setting of $\mathbb{R}^3$...

share|improve this answer
add comment

Let me add some uniqueness theorems for CMC and minimal surfaces:

1) A classical theorem of Hopf says that any immersed CMC sphere in $\mathbb{R}^3$ is the round sphere.

2) A classical theorem of Aleksandrov says that any embedded closed hypersurface in Euclidean space with constant mean curvature is the round sphere.

3) Very recently, Simon Brendle proved the Lawson conjecture: Any embedded minimal torus in $S^3$ is congruent to the Clifford torus, see arXiv:1203.6597v2.

share|improve this answer
    
I would like to add a comment to Mr. Haslhofer's answer: This was conjectured by H.Hopf that any immersed surface of constant mean curvature is the round sphere, however, a counterexample by H.Wente proved it incorrect. –  S.A.A Jun 22 '12 at 3:40
add comment

Let me describe the case of CMC tori in $\mathbb{R}^3$ or $S^3:$ There does not exist a complete classification, but it was shown by Hitchin and Pinkall/Sterling independently that all these CMC tori are given (explicitly) in terms of algebro-geometric data defined on a compact Riemann surface, the so-called spectral curve. Associated to CMC surfaces is a holomorphic family of flat connections. These connections reduce due to the abelian nature of the fundamental group of a torus to the direct sum of flat line bundle connections. The spectral curve parametrizes these flat line bundles, and it can be shown that the spectral curve is compact. The log derivative of the holonomy (as a function) of the flat connections is given by an abelian differential with prescribed poles. Moreover, the eigenlines of the holonomy (with respect to a point on the torus) determine a holomorphic line bundle, which flows linearly in the Picard variety when the point on the torus flows.

The remaining problem is to determine the possible spectral curves, i.e. those who give rise to closed surfaces without periods. For CMC tori in $\mathbb{R}^3$ the possible spectral curve are somehow dense like the rationals in the reals, and for CMC tori in $S^3$ the possible spectral curves can be deformed smoothly. But a complete classification is still open.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.