Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f:X\to Y$ be a proper morphism of normal varieties (smooth as DM stacks, but I only care about the coarse spaces). The map $f$ is generically finite, but not flat (so no hope of smoothness and Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch applying) and I have a fairly detailed understanding of the fiber over any point, images of $f$ restricted to divisors and so forth.

Now, take a divisor $D$, and identify it with an invertible sheaf in the standard way. I'm looking for a way to compute the first Chern class of $f_*D$ on $Y$.

share|cite|improve this question
I guess you mean $D$ is a Cartier divisor, right? (Otherwise you'll get a reflexive sheaf, but not an invertible one.) –  Dave Anderson Dec 18 '10 at 22:11
Yes, $D$ can be taken as Cartier for this. –  Charles Siegel Dec 18 '10 at 22:31
You can still use GRR. For example you can represent your map as a composition of a closed embedding of smooth DM stacks and a smooth map and apply GRR for each step separately. –  Sasha Dec 19 '10 at 9:12

1 Answer 1

Do you know the (generic) degree of your map $f$? As you probably know, standard intersection theory says $f_*[D] = n[f(D)]$ as classes in $A_{d-1}Y$, where $n$ is the degree of $f$ (restricted to $D$) and $d=\dim X = \dim Y$. No flatness or smoothness hypotheses on $f$ are needed for this; the sticky point is in identifying these divisors with line bundles. But since you're dealing with smooth DM stacks, that should be ok (over ${\Bbb Q}$ at least).

EDIT (incorporating the comments): For a proper map $f$, there is a map defined at the cycle level by $$f_*[D] = n\cdot [f(D)],$$ where $n$ is the degree of $D$ over $f(D)$ (i.e., degree of the induced field extension) when these have equal dimension, and $n=0$ when $\dim f(D)< \dim D$. This passes to rational equivalence, so defines a map $A_{d-1}X \to A_{d-1}Y$. In particular, if $f$ collapses a divisor $D$, then $f_*[D]=0$.

All this is in Fulton's Intersection Theory, Section 1.4.

share|cite|improve this answer
I do, but the divisors I'm most interested in are in the non-finite locus, and so have image of smaller dimension. –  Charles Siegel Dec 18 '10 at 23:03
Ah, that explains the question. Well, this just means the answer is zero. Unless I'm missing something obvious here... –  Dave Anderson Dec 18 '10 at 23:14
PS: For reference, Fulton's Intersection Theory, section 1.4. (But I guess you must know this stuff.) –  Dave Anderson Dec 18 '10 at 23:16
Is this always true, then? The homomorphism on cycles behaves nicely with respect to chern classes? My concern is that the higher codimension cycle may be the zero locus of a section of some vector bundle on $Y$, and I might have a nontrivial chern class for that. –  Charles Siegel Dec 18 '10 at 23:45
Ah, I see now what your concern is. You really want to do the pushforward in K-theory, and then apply the Chern character... Fortunately, GRR doesn't require anything more than properness of $f$ -- and, for the basic versions, smoothness of $X$ and $Y$. I think the reduction to pushforward on Chow groups still goes through (for divisors), though, but should doublecheck this. –  Dave Anderson Dec 19 '10 at 0:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.