vote up 11 vote down
star
4

Apologies for the very simple question, but I can't seem to find a reference one way or the other, and it's been bugging me for a while now.

Is there a compact (Hausdorff, or even T1) (topological) group which is infinite, but has countable cardinality? The "obvious" choices don't work; for instance, \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z} (with the obvious induced topology) is non-compact, and I get the impression that profinite groups are all uncountable (although I might be wrong there). So does someone have an example, or a reference in the case that there are no such groups?

flag
5 
For topological groups T1 and Hausdorff are equivalent conditions. – Konstantin Slutsky Nov 10 at 22:42

7 Answers

vote up 20 vote down
check

No, there is no countably infinite compact Hausdorff topological group.

Indeed such a group G would have a left-invariant Haar measure m with m(G)=1 and all points would have the same measure (since the group acts transitively on itself). But then, by countable additivity of the measure m, the group itself would have measure m(G)=0 or m(G)=\infty according as its points all had m(p)=0 or m(p)>0 . A contradiction in both cases to the fact that m(G)=1 .

link|flag
vote up 12 vote down

A Baire category argument shows that any countable, locally compact Hausdorff group must be discrete. Of course, to moreover be compact it would have to be finite.

In more detail (apologies if this is known/tedious): in any locally compact Hausdorff topological space, the intersection of a countable collection of open dense subsets is dense - the proof is basically the one usually taught for complete metric spaces, I don't know off-hand where to find the LCH case but Kelley's book seems an obvious first guess. From this you can show that any countable locally compact Hausdorff top space must contain an isolated point (open and closed). [Cf. Konstantin's answer.] Since we're in a topological group, translations are homeomorphisms and thus every point is isolated, i.e. the space is discrete.

link|flag
vote up 10 vote down

EDIT: Both Georges's and Yemon's arguments are better since they avoid explanation why the group has to be metrizable.

No, there is no countably infinite compact group. The reason is that such group would be metrizable and hence a compact Polish space without isolated points. Into any such space one can embed the Cantor set, which is uncountable. The latter is not hard to prove, or you can look at Kechris, Classical Descriptive Set Theory, Theorem 6.2.

link|flag
2 
That's a remarkably generous comment, Konstantin: congratulations on your fair play! – Georges Elencwajg Nov 10 at 23:48
vote up 4 vote down

The identity component of a compact Hausdorff group is a connected, normal Hausdorff space, so by Urysohn's lemma, if it has two points it is uncountable. Therefore a countable compact Hausdorff group is totally disconnected. But then it is a profinite group, and it must be finite, for infinite profinite groups are uncountable.

link|flag
vote up 1 vote down

How about any countably infinite group with trivial topology (the only open sets are the empty set and everything)?

link|flag
Good point, I think I meant Hausdorff. – Harrison Brown Nov 10 at 22:34
The question is, probably, about Hausdorff groups. – Konstantin Slutsky Nov 10 at 22:35
vote up 1 vote down

Well, you could take $\mathbb{Z}$ with the indiscrete topology, as Kevin said.

If you wanted it to be Hausdorff, then it's profinite if it's totally disconnected, and so it would be uncountable or finite in that case. If it weren't totally disconnected, it would be uncountable.

link|flag
vote up 0 vote down

Given a compact Hausdorff space without isolated points, one can easily construct an embedding of the Cantor set into it: take two points, separate them with closure-disjoint open sets, repeat iteratively in each balls' closure. Since we started with a group, it is homogeneous, so either no points are isolated - and hence there is an embedded Cantor set of cardinality $2^\omega$ - or all points are isolated, which implies finiteness due to compactness.

link|flag
I like the idea, but is it really that easy to show that the construction gets you a big enough set? In a metric space I agree that this intersection will contain a copy of the Cantor set, but in a general LCH space I seem to be missing something. (I'm not saying the construction doesn't work, but that it seems to require a bit more slogging than your answer suggests.) – Yemon Choi Dec 8 at 17:30
Right, this may not end up with a set homeomorphic to the Cantor set, but rather one with a surjection onto a Cantor set. Let $A^{s0}_n$ and $A^{s1}_n$ ($s$ is a length $n-1$ bit string) be the two disjoint closed sets within $A^{s}_{n-1}$, with the starting set $A^{\emptyset}_0$, the whole space. For each chain $A^{b_1}_1 \supset A^{b_1b_2}_2 \supset ...$ of closed (hence compact) sets their intersection will be nonempty; in general, it may not be a single point, but mapping it to the corresponding point $\sum \frac{b_j}{3^j}$ in the Cantor set will give you a surjective (and continuous) map. – Thorny Dec 9 at 9:54

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.