Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.


In general, I am aware of four and a half methods of long-distance collaboration:

  1. Telephone (including voice-chat, VOIP, etc.; anything that is voice based)
  2. Text chat (chat room, IM, gchat, things like that)
  3. E-mail (or other asynchronous messaging system)
  4. Online whiteboards, real-time collaborative text editors, desktop-sharing (or other software, graphical system)
  5. (The half) Adding a webcam to any of the above and call it Video-blah.

What this question is not about

I am not asking about tools for collaborative paper-writing which has already been addressed here last year. So in particular, to limit the scope, this question is not about the part in a collaboration when all the ideas are set-out, all the heuristics checked, and all that's left is to flesh out the argument and write it up.

I am also not asking for just a list of services. I am fairly confident my Google-fu is at least as good as yours.

What this question is about

I am interested in tools that help collaboration in the earlier stage when we are still brainstorming, setting the scope of the project; or the stage where we are troubleshooting to fix a flawed argument. In other words, I am interested in the scenarios where the ideal thing to do would be for a face-to-face chat while writing on a black board or a piece of paper, but when it is difficult to do so (both of you have to teach, and you are on different continents).

In other words, I am asking about situations where real-time, instantaneous interactions are preferred (and so option 3, e-mail, should be reserved as a last resort). In this sense, voice interaction is preferred: it is a lot easier to interrupt the other party when talking then when typing, and be able to force a change of direction in the conversation. On the other hand, e-mail and a lot of the chat software has the advantage that your discussions are automatically documented and saved for future review. The main downside to a pure voice communication, however, is that (for me at least) mathematics is visual. It helps a lot when there is a black board or a piece of paper with equations on it on which I can focus my attention. So I'm especially interested in ways that I can share mathematics visually (rendered LaTeX, diagrams, things like that).

The Question

There are two questions:

  • Personal testimonials: of the above solutions, which, and in what combinations, have you used and feel strongly about. I would especially appreciate it if you can say a few words about the strengths and potential weaknesses of the setup.
  • Thinking outside the box: are there other solutions that I have overlooked in my list above?
share|cite|improve this question
Great question! (I know that some people find private blogs very useful.) – Gil Kalai Dec 14 '10 at 16:04
grumble grumble heuristics grumble grumble – Loop Space Dec 14 '10 at 19:55
another great method: Oberwolfach Research in Pair program: – Pietro Majer Dec 14 '10 at 20:02
@Pietro and Ben: similarly to the RiP is the AIM SQUARES program one of which I will be doing sometime next year. I'll try to report back whether it is sufficiently isolated like Oberwolfach to be conducive to research. :) – Willie Wong Dec 15 '10 at 13:58
Having just returned from an AIM SQUARES, I have to say that since their math castle ( hasn't yet been built, the current "warehouse" setting of the AIM is very conducive to research, despite being situated in the middle of Palo Alto in sunny California. – Willie Wong Apr 24 '12 at 11:38

15 Answers 15

I'm a little late to the party, and a lot of my favorite tools have been mentioned, but since Willie Wong asked for testimonials...

  • Meta: don't expect it to be 'just as easy'! If you suggest to use some of these tools, make sure your collaborator understands that this requires effort (at least initially) and a different routine.
  • audio/video: video calls are cheap and easy to use -- perfect for all those hand-waving arguments. I mostly use skype (I tried tokbox for multi-user conferencing but never used it frequently). Also, as mentioned by Beth, skype is good enough to broadcast a (small) blackboard. If you have real camcorder, you can broadcast using vlc, or ustream for higher resolution video (this comes with lag, so keep some other audio solution). Also great to hook people up to seminars btw.
  • Online whiteboards with tablets! The combination of online whiteboards and tablets is my favorite since it can be set up almost anywhere. I personally use scriblink and dabbleboard extensively; scriblink is more reliable and uses less bandwidth, but dabbleboard has fancier technology (shape recognition, upload documents as background). For more privacy, there's also jarnal which can connect across the net, but I could never get it to work through firewalls. There are also all-in-one tools like dimdim -- but they were always too general for my purpose (and had problems with flash under linux). As already mentioned by Michael, whiteboards only make sense with a tablet of some sorts (I was happy with a wacom bamboo (cheap), but a tabletpc is even better (I have an HP TM2 running ubuntu)) Of course, you can type text on online whiteboards (scriblink even does a little TeX), but there are better tools for plain text.
  • Remote Desktops Sometimes I also like to connect the desktops, i.e., allowing one side to fully access the other side's desktop. I usually do this via teamviewer (connects through firewalls), but vnc, rdp are good, too. The advantage: all your programs are there! Anything you can do on your computer, you can do together. E.g., Xournal, OneNote for tablet-scribbling, gummi or latexian for live-previewed LaTeX, pdf-viewers for collaborative document browsing etc.
  • LaTeX (in the cloud) If you just want to scribble some TeX, there are many wikis with $\LaTeX$ support. I use Tiddlywiki with the mathsvg-plugin a lot these days -- a single html/javascript file, portable, fast TeX. Combined with a cloud service like dropbox or and you can keep everything up-to-date in real time.
share|cite|improve this answer
Does Dropbox really work when multiple people are editing at the same time? I suspect not --- if two people have the same file opened, only the version of the last one to press "save" is kept. I suggest a real VCS like git or mercurial instead. They have a steeper learning curve, but you get more in return. – Federico Poloni Jan 26 '12 at 14:17

First, the disclaimer: although I do have long-distance collaborations, I've not yet done much real-time serious mathematics. The reasons for this are many and varied, but one relevant one is simply that my speed-of-thought is actually much slower than (I suspect) many people's so even in short-distance collaborations the "together time" is spent in reporting rather than brain-storming and that's a bit different.

That said, "doing maths online" is a bit of a pet project of mine at the moment, so here's some thoughts.

  1. Use a wiki. Instiki, of course, as it's the only one with decent maths support. This isn't for the actual dialogue, but given that the time is going to be precious, it will be useful to "set the agenda" beforehand and "take minutes" afterwards.

  2. For the actual collaboration, I'd recommend jarnal. It has a client-server part so you can set up a "virtual whiteboard" for collaborating. Of course, you'd need to add the voice bit on top (telephone, per chance?). With a graphics tablet, I'd think that this would work just fine. I've used jarnal for writing in lectures and have found it very easy to use. Writing on a tablet instead of the screen quickly becomes second nature as well. (For the record, I use a Wacom Bamboo Fun tablet which I picked up in the UK for around 30 quid and I find it works just fine.) Jarnal is also cross-platform (written in java) so there's no worry about different operating systems not supporting it. Note that using something like Jarnal has the distinct advantage over webcam+whiteboard that the session is saved automatically.

  3. If the emphasis is less on real time, I would recommend a Mathematics-enabled forum (I happen to know one I could let you have at a very reasonable price, no obvious damage, no income tax, no VAT, ...). It is almost real-time, when necessary one can take the time to compose a longer answer, and the back-and-forth is recorded as well. Again, this probably reflects the fact that my "speed of thought" is slower than most, so I like to be able to read what the other person has written and ponder it a little before replying.

I suspect that a good collaboration would use something akin to all three of those: the real-time for the brainstorming, the forum for the more thoughtful discussions, and the wiki for recording the bits that stand the test of time.

share|cite|improve this answer
For the record, I am a big fan of Jarnal, and I see now I have not been using it to its full potential. One technical question: I assume that for the client-server use, the "server" side cannot be behind a firewall or behind an NAT, right? – Willie Wong Dec 15 '10 at 13:50
Willie: I've never actually used it for long-distance work so I don't know. I'd be happy to do the experiment to find out as I'd quite like to know if it would work if ever I wanted to use it in such a fashion. – Loop Space Dec 15 '10 at 13:56
Andrew, you seem to have much more experience with Jarnal than I do (I always found the lack of pressure sensitivity unfortunate which is one of the reasons to prefer xournal). If you can get the client-server thing to work through firewalls, please post a how-to somewhere :) – Peter Krautzberger Dec 15 '10 at 16:15
What does it mean that the session is saved automatically ? The final state of white board or one can play back the whiteboard conversation, I mean the pen moves ? – Zoran Skoda Dec 15 '10 at 17:25
Peter, I actually prefer xournal but have had to switch to jarnal because the machines in the lecture rooms where I teach run Windows so I need something cross-platform there. If you read my answer carefully, you'll see that I've not actually used the client-server thing "in anger", but if anyone would like to try it with me then I'd be happy to do the experiment. – Loop Space Dec 15 '10 at 19:33

I have been using SKYPE with the webcam pointed at my office whiteboard. I have found that the video quality is good enough to read what is on the other person's whiteboard. This isn't as nice as all parties being able to write on the same surface, but it's a great improvement over just talking and is very easy to do.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Beth, excellent approach. And just take a snapshot with the web-cam in order to archive the contents of the whiteboard before erasing or significantly changing it. – sleepless in beantown Dec 14 '10 at 15:57
Also works with an office blackboard. And yes, I do take pictures. On the other hand, for picture free discussions (rare) and bouncing possible references I prefer google chat because what is said stays archived and searchable. – Barbara Dec 14 '10 at 18:42
Is a standard cheap webcam good enough for this? Or is it worth buying a more expensive high-resolution (say 640x480 or 720p) for that purpose? – Arend Bayer Feb 12 '11 at 18:58

What needs to exist is a system that's akin to this site's functionality that could be used on a personal or university server and allow multiple people to contribute (via password-protected entry to the web-site) together to a notebook page which contains $\LaTeX$ markup and does it in a clean fashion.

Perhaps the newer incarnation or instantiation of MO being tested on would allow for something like "private question pages" which are invitation only and could be used as an adjunct for white-board like functionality while the participants also use a telephone or skype or any other tools for instant collaboration. This technique would also allow for asynchronous updating by the collaborators if they happen to be living/working in different time zones.

share|cite|improve this answer
or the tools/software used to implement alphaMO could be copied onto your university or department or company's web server and used in a private way as I described above (2010-12-14 10h40est) sleepless "i am not ghp" n. beantown :) bfeb4246b56c5d98198c85f8b75b71fa – sleepless in beantown Dec 14 '10 at 15:42

It seems that there are still some tools missing in this long list. What I really enjoy more and more is a version control system. Personally, I prefer git over other more centralized solutions like subversion. It has several nice advantages when you're using different computers (say a desktop in your office and a laptop on the train or so) for which you do not have always a reliable internet connection. With the de-centralized approach of git, this is no big problem, you can commit changes locally and merge things back globally at a later time.

I have by now made some nice experience with collaborators all over the globe using this...

share|cite|improve this answer
@Stefan: thanks for chiming in. But please note the second paragraph of the original question: your post belongs better on the linked thread there. – Willie Wong Jan 26 '12 at 15:20
@Willie: sorry, you may be right. Nevertheless, I also use that for collaboration along, sending notes back and forth and so on. Only in the final stage, this ends up with writing a paper (hopefully). I guess, I will leave the answer here, mainly since I don't know how to move it efficiently :) – Stefan Waldmann Jan 26 '12 at 16:09

Using an online whiteboard with pen tablets while talking over skype is the closest I've come to sitting around a piece of paper. I've done this with two other people simultaneously and it worked quite well.

Unfortunately everyone needs additional hardware for this setup to be fun, but the cheapest pen tablets (from Wacom e.g.) are at about 70$ and are quite easy to use and get used to. The most annoying part as I recall were the online whiteboards which could crash or behave strange, not have enough writing area or didn't allow saving the content. For a short while a good alternative was google docs drawings, but it looks like they've removed the freehand drawing tool. So I'm still looking for something adequate there. Correction: Google docs drawings may be used as an online whiteboard and allows one to save the content. The scribble tool can be found under the shape button.

Edit: (in response to Willies comment). Stingy as I am I've only used free online whiteboards so I really can't complain. The best of these I've found were twiddla, scriblink and skrbl. Some of them have paid plans which probably increase the user experience.

Concerning the pen tablet I have an older version of the Wacom Bamboo Pen with which I'm happy. The fancier ones use a screen as a writing surface. I imagine that makes it feel more like writing on paper, but I'm waiting for those to merge with computer tablets.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Michael: is there an online whiteboard service or a pen tablet that you would especially recommend? If so, why? If not, is there anything I should be on the look-out for when evaluating whiteboard services and tablets? – Willie Wong Dec 14 '10 at 14:32
I have a Wacom Intuos myself (without a screen on the tablet) and I can say that it takes approximately 4 minutes to get used to writing on the tablet while looking at the screen. So I wouldn't recommend anyone to spend twice as much money for the luxury of a screen on the tablet. – Alex B. Dec 15 '10 at 0:48
The above-mentioned twiddla gives you a free "Pro account" (which allows you, e.g., to store your white board sessions) if you have an email address ending with .edu -- see the bottom of for details. – matthias beck Dec 15 '10 at 3:16

also specific forum discussions and wikis may be useful: my last arxiv preprint has been essentially developed on before being put in paper form. It may be of interest to this topic that teh three authors of have never meet face-to-face and the whole developement of the paper has been via web tools.

(sorry for making an example in which I'm personally involved)

share|cite|improve this answer
Pretty much ditto (even though Urs and I met once before at a conference, we weren't collaborating or even considering it at the time), except that it was all via email, sparked off by something Urs had done at the n-category cafe. – David Roberts Dec 14 '10 at 20:21

Tools I've actually used

While not serious mathematics, I have written computer programs collaboratively in real-time with

  • Skype(Voice) and a cheap USB headset to have my hands free
  • Etherpad (Real-time simultaneous document editor)
  • Custom shell script to feed the etherpad document right into the compiler

Works perfectly for this particular purpose. In particular, it's much better than two persons trying to program in front of a single computer.

I've also bought a pen tablet (a small Wacom Bamboo Fun for about 90€) that I am using for mathematical illustrations. Being able to sketch pictures is astonishingly liberating when communicating mathematics on the computer!

Tools I'm planning to use

Of course, I'm now trying to use the tablet for real-time collaboration on mathematics. I haven't found a good modus operandi yet, though, apart from some experiments with the CoSketch online whiteboard. Usually, the main problem is that the colleague doesn't have a pen tablet himself…

I'm also looking into the possibility of setting up an electronic whiteboard with a Wii remote. But that would just be a substitute for a pen tablet.

Ah, and for sharing a set of documents with your colleague, there is Dropbox, which allows you to synchronize folders on different computers. No more chaos with different versions in different Emails!

share|cite|improve this answer

Sorry to revive a post so old, but I figured I'd add a small collaboration tool I just built. OP mentioned chat services and $ LaTeX $. Check out, a super-simple webchat that renders $LaTeX$ math (using MathJax). I built it to address guiding others through equations online (e.g. a tutor or studygroup setting), but it's as general as a chat can be. Cheers!

share|cite|improve this answer
@jbenet: that looks nice! Thanks for chiming in. I have a few questions about the service (since you are the developer, figure I'll let you answer them here to describe more the service): (a) is there a way of marking rooms as private and only invite certain people to participate? (b) is there a way to export the entire chat session into, say, a text file to be saved for future documentation? (c) what is the data retention policy on this service? – Willie Wong Jan 26 '12 at 15:25
Part of the reason why I ask is that when I click on "About", only half or less of the pop-up is visible on the viewport on my rather small netbook. And scrolling doesn't seem to effect the overlaid text balloon. So I don't actually know if you have even explained those points on your site! :) Cheers. – Willie Wong Jan 26 '12 at 15:26
This is no longer online, but code seems to live here: – Memming Oct 13 '14 at 21:29

I once had experience of writing "collaborative" text in LaTeX by using subversion -- a software versioning and a revision control system for program-developers. That was really cool! Everytime you have the most up to date version. All the "collisions" are dealt with automatically e.t.c.

The problem is -- all your collaborators has to be familiar with this software and the concepts. That's why I had such experience only once.

But I still use it for my own projects -- I setted up repository on my usb dongle, so I do not depend on the computer I use...

share|cite|improve this answer
@Kostya: actually all my papers are already in a private subversion repository. I found it easier to just have collaborators e-mail me their versions and let me merge them myself, than having to convince them the virtues of the svn command. – Willie Wong Dec 15 '10 at 22:19
I've switched to git. But I strongly recommend using a version control system. – Deane Yang Dec 16 '10 at 2:44

Maratech does exactly what you need. It has a video chat coupled with a shared whiteboard on which you can share pieces of text, drawings, pdf files, LaTeX code, etc. I've been using it for about three years for a collaboration with two Finnish mathematicians. The drawback, a big one, the company that made it was bought about two years ago and there hasn't been any word of it since.

share|cite|improve this answer

Since this has been stirred back up after so long, I will chime in;

is a great tool for organizing to-do lists with lots of tools for making the lists more than just lists.

share|cite|improve this answer

Collaborative mind-mapping / outlining?

  • (gear menu on top right -> "Enable LaTeX" -> use $inline$ and $$display$$ syntaxes). Editing a card locks it, all other changes (adding/dragging cards) are observed in real time.

  • Workflowy + mathflowy (abandoned) extension.

  • For the Emacs-inclined, Org mode + rudel or floobits or something? [discussion]

Disclaimer: never tried them in collaboration.

share|cite|improve this answer
Docear also springs to mind as a science-optimized mind mapper but only runs locally. – Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin Mar 23 at 0:36

Google wave. It's the next big thing.

share|cite|improve this answer
The next big thing insofar as its been deprecated by Google until the next big thing comes along? – Cam McLeman Dec 14 '10 at 13:56
Google wave is an open protocol so it doesn't matter that Google has deprecated its server, because other people can host. – h10 Dec 14 '10 at 14:30
Google stopped development on 4th August 2010. There is the reincarnation Apache Wave though. – Konrad Swanepoel Dec 14 '10 at 14:30
Willie's question is quite detailed, so it would be good to substantiate an answer with the requested testimonial. I have previously used the screen-share in skype with a colleague---it worked well, while simultaneously doing voice chat. – Suvrit Dec 14 '10 at 15:01

Has anyone tried one of these Logitech conference cameras with Skype

as a collaborative tool. I saw one report on-line of someone trying to use it to look at a whiteboard and claiming it didn't work because of reflections of the shiny surface.

Thanks - Michael

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.