2

Do we say that a function $f$ is uniformly almost periodic in the aforementioned proof if $f$ is bounded (in the sense that $||f||_{L^\infty}\leq 1$) and that there exists a natural number $d>0$ such that $f\in UAP^d$?

Edit: the proof in question appears in Tao's paper "A quantitative ergodic theory proof of Szemerédi's theorem".

flag
I'm not really sure what this question wants. From a quick read of the paper (available here: combinatorics.org/Volume_13/PDF/v13i1r99.pdf) the answer is "yes, but I don't see why we need $\|f\|_{L^\infty}\leq 1$". – Matthew Daws Dec 13 2010 at 15:49
The question wants the definition of uniformly almost periodic functions in the paper and not in the infinitary ergodic theory setting. – unknown (google) Dec 13 2010 at 16:38
1 
I think uniform almost periodicity here mean being an element of $UAP^d$. – Dee Dec 14 2010 at 11:44

2 Answers

1

As I mentioned in my comment above, a uniform almost periodic function (of order $d$) is an element of $UAP^d$ for some $d$. The bound $||f||_{L^\infty}\leq1$ is unnecessary.

link|flag
+1, as I agree (and I said this in my comment above as well!) – Matthew Daws Dec 28 2010 at 14:50
0

I think it means the continuous functions on the Bohr compactification of the reals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_function#Uniform_or_Bohr_or_Bochner_almost_periodic_functions

link|flag
1 
Well, the setting in Tao's proof is finitary, in the sense that the function $f$ above is defined on a finite cyclic group $Z_N$. Thus, continuous functions on the Bohr compactification of the reals might not be the answer. – unknown (google) Dec 13 2010 at 14:54

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.